University only requires applying digital media rather than continuously upgrading textbook. Agree or disagree.
One of the most conspicuous trends of today’s world is to upgrading content through digital media rather than printing textbooks. There is a widespread worry that this would only lead to a myriad of concerns. In my opinion, this apprehension is unwarranted and so should be rejected.
There are a number of arguments in favour of my stance. The most preponderant one is that with the advance technology and their wide applications have significant impact on education system. Most of the students at university or college own portable devices such as iPad, laptop, mobile phone and notebook. Recognizing the increased number of electronic device, publishers are offering their books in digital format which are easy to download and reduce the time and money for both students and universities. Needless to say, all these merits stand digital media in good stead, as far as time and money is concerned.
Another pivotal aspect of this argument is that every updated semester universities can edit the content through social networking websites and post in college website instead of printing the whole textbook again. Moreover, students also prefer e-books nowadays. For instance, recently a survey conducted by University of California showed that out of 100 students 85 students are choosing digital e-books are source of study.
In view of the arguments outlined above, one can conclude that the benefits of upgrading content and providing online information to the student are indeed too great to ignore.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2021-01-23 | PAULO ROBERTO OLIVEIRA SILVA | 55 | view |
| 2020-11-09 | Basil3241 | 67 | view |
| 2020-09-23 | parveen123456 | 77 | view |
| 2020-07-16 | mike trazer | 54 | view |
| 2020-06-06 | mike trazer | 82 | view |
- Student travel to study is overrated, we have brilliant scholars who studied locally. Is travel really required for higher studies? 85
- Some people think that keeping pets is good for children while others think it is dangerous and unhealthy. Which opinion do you agree with? Discuss both options and give examples. 85
- Some people think placing advertisements in schools is a great resource for public schools that need additionally funding, but others think it exploits children by treating them as a captive audience for corporate sponsors. 85
- Effective learning requires time, comfort and peace, so it is impossible to combine study and employment. Study and employment distract one from another. To what extent do you think the statements are realistic? Support your opinion with examples. 77
- We are becoming increasingly dependent on computers. They are used in businesses, hospitals, crime detection and even to fly planes. What things will they be used for in the future? Is this dependence on computers a good thing or should we be more suspici 88
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, if, moreover, so, for instance, such as, in my opinion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 10.5418719212 123% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 6.10837438424 65% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 8.36945812808 119% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 5.94088669951 101% => OK
Pronoun: 13.0 20.9802955665 62% => OK
Preposition: 33.0 31.9359605911 103% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 5.75862068966 87% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1283.0 1207.87684729 106% => OK
No of words: 241.0 242.827586207 99% => OK
Chars per words: 5.32365145228 5.00649968141 106% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.94007293032 3.92707691288 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.81298423171 2.71678728327 104% => OK
Unique words: 150.0 139.433497537 108% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.622406639004 0.580463131201 107% => OK
syllable_count: 405.0 379.143842365 107% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.57093596059 108% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 4.6157635468 22% => OK
Article: 1.0 1.56157635468 64% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.71428571429 58% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.931034482759 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 3.65517241379 55% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 12.6551724138 95% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 20.5024630542 98% => OK
Sentence length SD: 53.0641645139 50.4703680194 105% => OK
Chars per sentence: 106.916666667 104.977214359 102% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.0833333333 20.9669160288 96% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.0 7.25397266985 69% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.33497536946 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 6.9802955665 72% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 2.75862068966 109% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 2.91625615764 137% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.156929190369 0.242375264174 65% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.047955029858 0.0925447433944 52% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0564516540209 0.071462118173 79% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0874276973601 0.151781067708 58% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0500802697878 0.0609392437508 82% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.7 12.6369458128 108% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 42.72 53.1260098522 80% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.54236453202 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 10.9458128079 112% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.58 11.5310837438 118% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.0 8.32886699507 120% => OK
difficult_words: 82.0 55.0591133005 149% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.5 9.94827586207 75% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.3980295567 96% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 10.5123152709 133% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 88.8888888889 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 80.0 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.