Creative artists should always be given freedom to express their own ideas (in words, picture, music, film) in whichever way they wish. There should be no government restrictions on what they do.
To what extend do you agree or disagree with this statement?
There are a lot of people who are very talented and have already been masters in their field. Especially, these days the areas which have very big audience, such as, picture, music, film and etc. are developing significantly. However, it does not mean that they can express their ideas freely. Of course, there should be imposed limits of government in their activities. Without restriction there may be some problems, since some art works contain the ideas which are not suitable for children and a government’s laws.
For many years art has been playing the main role in our social life. Creative persons of art are respected in many countries, since they can attract people with their talent and result of their artistic works. However, most of them claim that there should not be restriction by government in their work, for they cannot show all of their particular ideas in this way. Moreover, as a result of this some talented people can leave the country which has strong restriction and work where they can work freely. On the other hand there will be danger of troubling many people if their activities are unlimited.
If we look at the history, even people with great gifts like Leonardo Da Vinci were not allowed to express any kind of ideas they wish. Also, in most areas artists were not let draw picture of a person, since it was prohibited by religion. At those times, religion helped a country to control people, so the rules of religion had to be obeyed. Even today, majority of films and songs must be checked by special laws of government, since there are some songs which have very unpleasant words. It is the most efficient way to spread bad ideas in films, so most of them influence on behaviour of children.
To sum up, I think the ideas of the artists must be limited by law. It is easy get attention of people with these ideas, since they are very popular today.
- Should wealthy nations be required to share their wealth among poorer nations by providing such things as food and education? Or is it the responsibility of the governments of poorer nations to look after their citizens themselves? 68
- When a country develops its technology the traditional skills and ways of life die out It is pointless to try and keep them alive To what extent do you agree or disagree with this opinion 87
- Private companies, that support and carry out scientific researches, are spending more than governments in these days. Do the advantages of this development outweigh its disadvantages? Explain your opinion and give specific reasons. 80
- The idea of having a single career is becoming an old fashioned one The new fashion will be to have several careers or ways of earning money and further education will be something that continues throughout life 75
- When the time comes to commence full time employment individuals who have graduated from university deserve a high salary than those who have not To what extend do you agree or disagree with this opinion 68
flaws:
Sentence Length SD: 4.753 7.5
Read this link about sentence length SD:
http://www.testbig.com/question/questions-about-essay-e-rater
Attribute Value Ideal
Score: 7.0 out of 9
Category: Good Excellent
No. of Grammatical Errors: 0 2
No. of Spelling Errors: 0 2
No. of Sentences: 17 15
No. of Words: 333 350
No. of Characters: 1513 1500
No. of Different Words: 174 200
Fourth Root of Number of Words: 4.272 4.7
Average Word Length: 4.544 4.6
Word Length SD: 2.277 2.4
No. of Words greater than 5 chars: 87 100
No. of Words greater than 6 chars: 63 80
No. of Words greater than 7 chars: 38 40
No. of Words greater than 8 chars: 23 20
Use of Passive Voice (%): 0 0
Avg. Sentence Length: 19.588 21.0
Sentence Length SD: 4.753 7.5
Use of Discourse Markers (%): 0.706 0.12
Sentence-Text Coherence: 0.312 0.35
Sentence-Para Coherence: 0.508 0.50
Sentence-Sentence Coherence: 0.084 0.07
Number of Paragraphs: 4 5