TPO 30
Threading passage and the lecture both discuss the three arguments about the possibility of using “burning mirror” by the Greek when they defend against the attack by the Roman.
First, the author mentions the technology was not improved at that time in the Greek for using such weapon because there is a special design for the mirror. The professor avers that the experiment shows us not need to a large mirror to produce the fire, in contrast, we need a small piece of that to do such burn.
Second, the reading passage states the time to set a fire should be long enough. While the speaker cast doubt on that by explaining the materials used in the building a ship not only wood, but there is a sticky substance that also uses. Moreover, this material could burn in a second.
Third, the reading passage telling us about the arrows are more useful than the mirror. The professor discusses the mirror are more effective and surprising than the arrows
- TPO-44 - Integrated Writing Task In 1957 a European silver coin dating to the eleventh century was discovered at a Native American archaeological site in the state of Maine in the United States. Many people believed the coin had been originally brought to 64
- uestion:Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?Teachers should not make their social or political views known to students in the classroom.Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer. 58
- TPO-32 - Integrated Writing Task Starting in the 1960s and continuing until the 1980s, sailors in Russian submarines patrolling the North Alantic and Arctic Ocean would occasionally hear strange sounds. These underwater noises reminded the submarine crews 68
- Genetic modifications of the trees. 71
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statements？ Because people are busy doing so many different things, they do very few things well. Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer. 52
Comments
Essay evaluation report
flaws:
No. of Words: 168 250
not enough content. about 250 words wanted.
---------------------
Attribute Value Ideal
Final score: 18 in 30
Category: Satisfactory Excellent
No. of Grammatical Errors: 0 2
No. of Spelling Errors: 0 2
No. of Sentences: 8 12
No. of Words: 168 250
No. of Characters: 766 1200
No. of Different Words: 100 150
Fourth Root of Number of Words: 3.6 4.2
Average Word Length: 4.56 4.6
Word Length SD: 2.243 2.4
No. of Words greater than 5 chars: 52 80
No. of Words greater than 6 chars: 33 60
No. of Words greater than 7 chars: 19 40
No. of Words greater than 8 chars: 13 20
Use of Passive Voice (%): 0 0
Avg. Sentence Length: 21 21.0
Sentence Length SD: 8.529 7.5
Use of Discourse Markers (%): 0.75 0.12
Sentence-Text Coherence: 0.407 0.35
Sentence-Para Coherence: 0.728 0.50
Sentence-Sentence Coherence: 0.144 0.07
Number of Paragraphs: 4 4
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, moreover, second, so, third, while, in contrast
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 6.0 10.4613686534 57% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 5.04856512141 79% => OK
Conjunction : 3.0 7.30242825607 41% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 6.0 12.0772626932 50% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 10.0 22.412803532 45% => OK
Preposition: 18.0 30.3222958057 59% => More preposition wanted.
Nominalization: 2.0 5.01324503311 40% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 800.0 1373.03311258 58% => More number of characters wanted.
No of words: 168.0 270.72406181 62% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.7619047619 5.08290768461 94% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.60020574368 4.04702891845 89% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.44009869322 2.5805825403 95% => OK
Unique words: 103.0 145.348785872 71% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.613095238095 0.540411800872 113% => OK
syllable_count: 245.7 419.366225166 59% => syllable counts are too short.
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.55342163355 97% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 3.25607064018 61% => OK
Article: 5.0 8.23620309051 61% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.25165562914 80% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.51434878587 66% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 2.5761589404 78% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 13.0662251656 61% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 21.0 21.2450331126 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 46.9201449273 49.2860985944 95% => OK
Chars per sentence: 100.0 110.228320801 91% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.0 21.698381199 97% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.125 7.06452816374 115% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 4.19205298013 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 4.33554083885 46% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 4.45695364238 112% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.27373068433 23% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.300796107019 0.272083759551 111% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.12108296885 0.0996497079465 122% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0546619467198 0.0662205650399 83% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.16329714711 0.162205337803 101% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0620695370583 0.0443174109184 140% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.5 13.3589403974 86% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 58.62 53.8541721854 109% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 5.55761589404 56% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 11.0289183223 93% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.33 12.2367328918 84% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.16 8.42419426049 97% => OK
difficult_words: 37.0 63.6247240618 58% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 14.0 10.7273730684 131% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.498013245 99% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 11.2008830022 89% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 60.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 18.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.