The flowchart illustrates the production of colored plastic paper clips in a small factory.
The given flowchart reveals information about production of colored plstic paper clips by a small factory. The data is calibrated in stages. Which is clearly and coherently represented.
It is crystal clear seen that, the main four stages in this daigram and divided into two parts. Such as the first part that is a prepartion of the clips, while other type of part is a quality of control these products.
To begin with, to take first step in this process molten plastic paper to them next three parts in divided; red mould, blue mould and yellow mould. Then these products to them quality control machines by checks for strength. Remaining waste plastic paper are rejected. Whereas, after that production sort by hand, and these products sent into mixed colours and single colours. Moreover, while rhen again this products by checking to quality control colour, and ready are the packed and despatched in the market.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2020-01-30 | tranhien297 | 61 | view |
| 2019-10-21 | Yanta | 61 | view |
| 2019-01-10 | terryielts | 61 | view |
| 2019-01-07 | huathibichngoc.c3.ltt@gmail.com | 56 | view |
| 2018-11-24 | www.www | 56 | view |
- The three pie charts below show the changes in annual spending by a particular UK school in 1981, 1991 and 2001. 78
- Some people think several short holidays from scgool are better, while others think one long summer holiday for the year is better, for children. Discuss and include your own opinion. 73
- The three pie charts below show the changes in annual spending by a particular UK school in 1981, 1991 and 2001. 78
- The bar charts below show the marriage and divorce statistics for nine countries in 1981 and 1994. 67
- The table below gives information about favorite pastimes in different countries in percentage. 78
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, moreover, so, then, whereas, while, such as, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 7.0 100% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 6.8 103% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 3.15609756098 127% => OK
Pronoun: 12.0 5.60731707317 214% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 23.0 33.7804878049 68% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 3.97073170732 101% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 771.0 965.302439024 80% => OK
No of words: 154.0 196.424390244 78% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.00649350649 4.92477711251 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.52273666998 3.73543355544 94% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.38049680805 2.65546596893 90% => OK
Unique words: 101.0 106.607317073 95% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.655844155844 0.547539520022 120% => OK
syllable_count: 222.3 283.868780488 78% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 3.0 4.33902439024 69% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 1.07073170732 280% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 2.0 0.482926829268 414% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 3.0 3.36585365854 89% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 8.94146341463 112% => OK
Sentence length: 15.0 22.4926829268 67% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 38.1367277044 43.030603864 89% => OK
Chars per sentence: 77.1 112.824112599 68% => OK
Words per sentence: 15.4 22.9334400587 67% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.5 5.23603664747 124% => OK
Paragraphs: 3.0 3.83414634146 78% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 3.70975609756 135% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.09268292683 98% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.263251240172 0.215688989381 122% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0963330212791 0.103423049105 93% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.149597066305 0.0843802449381 177% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.179988320123 0.15604864568 115% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.156607995372 0.0819641961636 191% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 9.9 13.2329268293 75% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 73.17 61.2550243902 119% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 6.8 10.3012195122 66% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.48 11.4140731707 101% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.17 8.06136585366 101% => OK
difficult_words: 37.0 40.7170731707 91% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 6.5 11.4329268293 57% => Linsear_write_formula is low.
gunning_fog: 8.0 10.9970731707 73% => OK
text_standard: 7.0 11.0658536585 63% => The average readability is low. Need to imporve the language.
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
More content wanted.
Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.