In any relationship between people, telling something affect to condition of relationship. In my opinion, I agree that always telling the truth is the most important consideration in any relationship between people. There are about two reasons for this statement: first, I can build a better relationship than before: second, I can fix my bad habit. Thus, I believe that telling the truth to people is much better than lying.
Primarily, by telling the truth, I can realize about them more and more, and I can build relationship better than before. I think that most important thing in relationship is truth and belief. Therefore, people have to tell the truth to their friends or families for better relationship and friendship. There is an example for this idea: when I was in middle school, one of my friends lied a lot for funny. However, he did not have many friends because students could not believe him because of his jokes. Thus, I realized that telling truth affects the relationship.
Secondarily, I can realize and fix my bad habit, which is related to telling such as, joking. Many people use joke for funny and relationship before telling the truth. On the other hand, I think that joking makes people’s relationship harmful. The reasons is that people can not believe their friend well. For example: when I was in middle school, I used to joke to my friends sometimes. One day, I realized that my bad habit when I am telling with them, so avoid telling jokes and finally, I was able to tell the truth.
In conclusion, there are a lot of reasons about importance of telling the truth. In my opinion, the two main idea, which are building better relationship with other friends and possibility of fixing or realizing bad habit, are most important. As a result, I believe that telling the truth is more important than not telling.
- professors on television 85
- Some people prefer to of exercise alone while others would like group sports Which do you prefer 80
- In 1938 an archaeologist in Iraq acquired a set of clay jars that had been excavated two years earlier by villagers constructing a railroad line. The vessel was about 2,200 years old. Each clay jay contained a copper cylinder surrounding an iron rod. The 3
- Many scientists believe it would be possible to maintain a permanent human presence on Mars or the Moon. On the other hand, conditions on Venus are so extreme and inhospitable that maintaining a human presence there would be impossible. First, atmospheric 71
- A little over 2 200 years ago the Roman navy attached the Greek port city of Syracuse According to some ancient historians the Greeks defended themselves with an ingenious weapon called a burning mirror a polished copper surface curved to focus 89
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 283, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...s for this statement: first, I can build a better relationship than before: secon...
^^
Line 5, column 262, Rule ID: AGREEMENT_SENT_START[4]
Message: You should probably use: 'are'.
Suggestion: are
...pos;s relationship harmful. The reasons is that people can not believe their frien...
^^
Line 5, column 510, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...telling jokes and finally, I was able to tell the truth. In conclusion, there ...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
finally, first, however, second, so, therefore, thus, well, for example, i think, in conclusion, such as, as a result, in my opinion, on the other hand, to tell the truth
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 15.1003584229 93% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 9.8082437276 71% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 13.8261648746 72% => OK
Relative clauses : 13.0 11.0286738351 118% => OK
Pronoun: 41.0 43.0788530466 95% => OK
Preposition: 34.0 52.1666666667 65% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 8.0752688172 50% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1541.0 1977.66487455 78% => OK
No of words: 318.0 407.700716846 78% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.84591194969 4.8611393121 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.22286093782 4.48103885553 94% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.76120864289 2.67179642975 103% => OK
Unique words: 139.0 212.727598566 65% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.437106918239 0.524837075471 83% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 468.9 618.680645161 76% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.51630824373 99% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 14.0 9.59856630824 146% => OK
Article: 2.0 3.08781362007 65% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 3.51792114695 28% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.86738351254 54% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.94265232975 121% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 19.0 20.6003584229 92% => OK
Sentence length: 16.0 20.1344086022 79% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 26.9220687157 48.9658058833 55% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 81.1052631579 100.406767564 81% => OK
Words per sentence: 16.7368421053 20.6045352989 81% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.94736842105 5.45110844103 164% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.5376344086 54% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 13.0 11.8709677419 110% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 3.85842293907 130% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.88709677419 20% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.231377619294 0.236089414692 98% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.101137840928 0.076458572812 132% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0951021356495 0.0737576698707 129% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.178795449742 0.150856017488 119% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0761408728501 0.0645574589148 118% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 9.8 11.7677419355 83% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 63.7 58.1214874552 110% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.10430107527 51% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.4 10.1575268817 83% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.55 10.9000537634 97% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 6.96 8.01818996416 87% => OK
difficult_words: 51.0 86.8835125448 59% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 10.002688172 85% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.4 10.0537634409 84% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.247311828 88% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
We are expecting: No. of Words: 350 while No. of Different Words: 200
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 60.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 18.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.