The well-being of a society is enhanced when many of its people question authorities. do you agree or disagree?
The author of the issue highlights that if people question authorities, the welfare of the society improve dramatically. Due to the controversial nature of this question, there is not a general argument on this issue. However, the popular sentiment to which I vehemently cling is that the improvement and development of any given society largely depend on its people' well-being. The underlying aim of this essay is to put forward some cogent reasons to shed light on a number of issues in this framework.
To commence with, it is established beyond doubt that people of any given society are the pillars of the nation because of the consequential role they play. Generally phrased, people need to live in a flourished and thrived society, so, it is incumbent upon authorities to heighten the welfare of the society. In fact, if the government pay attention to people's ideas and opinion, not only can the society make a progress day in day out but also can make the trustworthy and integrity widespread. As a palpable example, it is the most required and admired quality of all people but also the government. Indeed, the willingness and the ability of people that you look up is absolutely essential to perform at your very best. To elucidate more on this issue, if authorities allow people to ask their questions freely, trustworthy and integrity will enhance in the society and people will be able to trust each other in any realm.
Another equally salient point in corroborating my stance on this subject is that this behavior will create a mutual bond between people and authorities. If we take a minute to ponder over it, question authorities will provide an opportunity for people to increase their self-confidence and their self-esteem. So, it will provide fertile ground for the government to bend over backward and make efforts so as to make the society flourished. It can be deduced from a combination of breadth of coverage and depth of detail that authorities have been elected by people in the society. So, if the government does not allow people to question authorities, it might influence people negatively. That being so, authorities might not be able to work properly and precisely.
However, what was alluded to above can't be overgeneralized to all contexts. Along with the innumerable benefits it has, indisputably, authorities are knowledgeable and experienced people. So, they can make sound decisions and come up with wise ideas to improve people's well-being. Arguably, human beings might not have enough information about the society, so, they will not be able to ask impeccable questions or perhaps they might not be able to perceive the problems of the society. However, it was a story in a nutshell; actually, there are more reasonable grounds that can lend weight to my personal perspective.
In light of reasons elaborated, I reiterate that
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2018-08-09 | amirbahman | 66 | view |
- It is better for children to grow up in the countryside than in the big city. Do you agree or disagree? 86
- The following appeared in a memo from the director of student housing at Buckingham College."To serve the housing needs of our students, Buckingham College should build a number of new dormitories. Buckingham's enrollment is growing and, based on current 70
- tpo 3
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? Some people say that the Internet provides people with a lot of valuable information. Others think access to much information creates problems. Which view do you agree with? 73
- Are difficult experiences valuable lessons for the future? 86
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 674, Rule ID: ABSOLUTELY_ESSENTIAL[1]
Message: Use simply 'essential'.
Suggestion: essential
...e ability of people that you look up is absolutely essential to perform at your very best. To elucid...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 403, Rule ID: SO_AS_TO[1]
Message: Use simply 'to'
Suggestion: to
... to bend over backward and make efforts so as to make the society flourished. It can be ...
^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 36, Rule ID: CANT[1]
Message: Did you mean 'can't' or 'cannot'?
Suggestion: can't; cannot
... However, what was alluded to above cant be overgeneralized to all contexts. Alo...
^^^^
Line 9, column 49, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... of reasons elaborated, I reiterate that
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
actually, also, but, however, if, look, so, well, as to, in fact
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 23.0 19.5258426966 118% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 16.0 12.4196629213 129% => OK
Conjunction : 18.0 14.8657303371 121% => OK
Relative clauses : 10.0 11.3162921348 88% => OK
Pronoun: 40.0 33.0505617978 121% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 72.0 58.6224719101 123% => OK
Nominalization: 19.0 12.9106741573 147% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2407.0 2235.4752809 108% => OK
No of words: 476.0 442.535393258 108% => OK
Chars per words: 5.05672268908 5.05705443957 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.67091256922 4.55969084622 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.97779944974 2.79657885939 106% => OK
Unique words: 236.0 215.323595506 110% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.495798319328 0.4932671777 101% => OK
syllable_count: 767.7 704.065955056 109% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.59117977528 101% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 11.0 6.24550561798 176% => OK
Article: 5.0 4.99550561798 100% => OK
Subordination: 5.0 3.10617977528 161% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.77640449438 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.38483146067 114% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 22.0 20.2370786517 109% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 23.0359550562 91% => OK
Sentence length SD: 39.4564568033 60.3974514979 65% => OK
Chars per sentence: 109.409090909 118.986275619 92% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.6363636364 23.4991977007 92% => OK
Discourse Markers: 2.90909090909 5.21951772744 56% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 7.80617977528 51% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 12.0 10.2758426966 117% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 5.13820224719 58% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 7.0 4.83258426966 145% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.252808900066 0.243740707755 104% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0731416147119 0.0831039109588 88% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0584661808124 0.0758088955206 77% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.126740333502 0.150359130593 84% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0696797435517 0.0667264976115 104% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.2 14.1392134831 93% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 50.16 48.8420337079 103% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 12.1743820225 94% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.07 12.1639044944 99% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.33 8.38706741573 99% => OK
difficult_words: 110.0 100.480337079 109% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 11.8971910112 97% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 11.2143820225 93% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.7820224719 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 66.67 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 4.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.