The provided two pie charts depict some facts and figure about percent of students of British university speaking more than one languages in addition to english in 2000 and 2010.
This is discernible from the first layout that in year 2000 one-fifth of students were monolingual. Spanish which was spoken by 30% of learners was on top. While, French and German were second language for 15% and 10% students respectively. And, only one in hundred students were bilinguist.
This is also apparent from second chart that after ten years, students who could speak two other languages elevated by 5%. Whereas, students speaking single language decrease to half of its original value. French And German were spoken by same proportion of students that was 10%. But, Spanish remained most spoken second language, which increased to 35%. At last, another language spoken increased from 15% to 20%.
From over all analysis, it was seen that students speaking only one language decreased along with German language. While Spanish remained most popular language spoke among british students.
- Nowadays animal experiments are widely used to develop new medicines and to test the safety of other products. Some people argue that these experiments should be banned because it is morally wrong to cause animals to suffer, while others are in favour of 73
- Government should be responsible for funding and controlling scientific research rather than private organizations. To what extent do you agree or disagree 73
- There are many different types of music in the world today. Why do we need music? Is the traditional music of a country more important than the international music that is heared everywhere nowadays?Give reasons for your answer and include any relevant ex 78
- New technologies have changed the way children spend their free time. Do advantages of this outweigh disadvantages? 78
- Many things that used to be done in the home by hands are now being done by machines Does this development bring more advantages or disadvantages 62
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 125, Rule ID: ONE_PLURAL[1]
Message: Don't use the numeral 'one' with plural words. Did you mean 'one language', 'a language', or simply 'languages'?
Suggestion: one language; a language; languages
...f British university speaking more than one languages in addition to english in 2000 and 2010...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 259, Rule ID: NODT_DOZEN[1]
Message: Use simply: 'a hundred'.
Suggestion: a hundred
...students respectively. And, only one in hundred students were bilinguist. This is al...
^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 124, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “Whereas” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
...eak two other languages elevated by 5%. Whereas, students speaking single language decr...
^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 382, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...reased to 35%. At last, another language spoken increased from 15% to 20%. Fr...
^^
Line 7, column 116, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “While” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
...e decreased along with German language. While Spanish remained most popular language ...
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, if, second, so, whereas, while, in addition
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 7.0 143% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 6.8 74% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 3.15609756098 222% => Less relative clauses wanted (maybe 'which' is over used).
Pronoun: 8.0 5.60731707317 143% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 27.0 33.7804878049 80% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 3.97073170732 50% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 916.0 965.302439024 95% => OK
No of words: 173.0 196.424390244 88% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.29479768786 4.92477711251 108% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.62669911048 3.73543355544 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.43078532528 2.65546596893 92% => OK
Unique words: 106.0 106.607317073 99% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.612716763006 0.547539520022 112% => OK
syllable_count: 261.0 283.868780488 92% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 1.53170731707 196% => OK
Article: 1.0 4.33902439024 23% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 3.36585365854 59% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 8.94146341463 134% => OK
Sentence length: 14.0 22.4926829268 62% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 34.1585356178 43.030603864 79% => OK
Chars per sentence: 76.3333333333 112.824112599 68% => OK
Words per sentence: 14.4166666667 22.9334400587 63% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.08333333333 5.23603664747 97% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 5.0 1.69756097561 295% => Less language errors wanted.
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 3.70975609756 162% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.09268292683 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.280903881345 0.215688989381 130% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.103733388766 0.103423049105 100% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0722427624263 0.0843802449381 86% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.18576133656 0.15604864568 119% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.062220912176 0.0819641961636 76% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.7 13.2329268293 81% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 65.73 61.2550243902 107% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 7.6 10.3012195122 74% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.81 11.4140731707 112% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.62 8.06136585366 95% => OK
difficult_words: 36.0 40.7170731707 88% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 11.4329268293 70% => OK
gunning_fog: 7.6 10.9970731707 69% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 11.0658536585 72% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.