Nowadays land degradation occur all over the world. The pie chart shows the main reasons of land degradation and in the table is represented the information how these causes influenced on three regions of the world during 1990s.
Is a pie chart is shown three main causes of land degradation, such as overgrazing of the domestic animals, over-cultivation of the farmland and the deforestation. We can see that the overgrazing takes 35% the reasons of land degradation. The next serious cause of the soil fertility and environmental deterioration is the deforestation. Besides, the third global factor, which worsed the farmland conditions is overcultivating of the cereal crops and the composed 28 per cent.
The table shows all of the factors that influence on the soil degradation in the three different parts of the Earth, such as North America, Europe and Oceania. First of all, the main over-grazer of soil is Oceania. Here we can observe about 11.3 percent of the degradation. Europe and North America are considerably less worsed their farmlands with overgrazing. However, in Europe is notices significantly more deforestation, whereas in North America and Oceania the figures of deforestation are more less. Besides, in Europe is marked twice higher percent of the over-cultivation than in other both regions. Therefore, in Europe used lands suffer from investigated factors and total land degradation is 23%. More accurate are related to farmlands in North America, only 5% of all lands erupted due to human activities, while Oceania’s soils are degradated in 13% of cases.
To summarize all, we can say, “Save our planet, our Earth for future Generations”.
- The graph gives information about the age of the population of Iceland between 1990 and 2020 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 89
- Some people believe that there should be fixed punishments for each type of crime. Others, however, argue that the circumstances of an individual crime, and the motivation for committing it, should always be taken into account when deciding on the punishm 56
- Large shopping malls are replacing small shops. What is your opinion on this change? Good or bad? 84
- You should spend about 20 minutes on this task The chart below gives information on the percentage of Canadians gave money to charitable organisations by age range for the years 2000 and 2015 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main f 100
- Some people think that universities should provide graduates with the knowledge and skills needed in the workplace. Others think that the true function of a university should be to give access to knowledge for its own sake, regardless of whether the cours 73
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 216, Rule ID: IN_1990s[1]
Message: The article is probably missing here: 'during the 1990s'.
Suggestion: during the 1990s
...nfluenced on three regions of the world during 1990s. Is a pie chart is shown three main ca...
^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 17, Rule ID: ALL_OF_THE[1]
Message: Simply use 'all the'.
Suggestion: all the
... composed 28 per cent. The table shows all of the factors that influence on the soil degr...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 496, Rule ID: MOST_COMPARATIVE[2]
Message: Use only 'less' (without 'more') when you use the comparative.
Suggestion: less
...ceania the figures of deforestation are more less. Besides, in Europe is marked twice hig...
^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
besides, first, however, if, so, therefore, third, whereas, while, such as, first of all
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 7.0 186% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 3.0 1.00243902439 299% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 8.0 6.8 118% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 3.15609756098 95% => OK
Pronoun: 9.0 5.60731707317 161% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 39.0 33.7804878049 115% => OK
Nominalization: 16.0 3.97073170732 403% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1418.0 965.302439024 147% => OK
No of words: 267.0 196.424390244 136% => OK
Chars per words: 5.31086142322 4.92477711251 108% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.04229324003 3.73543355544 108% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.27902996041 2.65546596893 123% => OK
Unique words: 143.0 106.607317073 134% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.535580524345 0.547539520022 98% => OK
syllable_count: 441.9 283.868780488 156% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.45097560976 117% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 1.53170731707 196% => OK
Article: 5.0 4.33902439024 115% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 3.36585365854 149% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 8.94146341463 168% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 22.4926829268 76% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 42.3059754119 43.030603864 98% => OK
Chars per sentence: 94.5333333333 112.824112599 84% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.8 22.9334400587 78% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.86666666667 5.23603664747 112% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 1.69756097561 177% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 0.0 3.70975609756 0% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 8.0 1.13902439024 702% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 7.0 4.09268292683 171% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.290303657149 0.215688989381 135% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.101417642468 0.103423049105 98% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.14857884757 0.0843802449381 176% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.20941551678 0.15604864568 134% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.20974529321 0.0819641961636 256% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.5 13.2329268293 94% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 45.76 61.2550243902 75% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 6.51609756098 172% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 10.3012195122 108% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.22 11.4140731707 116% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.44 8.06136585366 105% => OK
difficult_words: 67.0 40.7170731707 165% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 11.4329268293 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.9970731707 80% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.0658536585 99% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.