The reading passage and the lecture both discuss three possible solutions to rescue the frog population. In the recent years, the frog population starts to reduce, and this retrogradation is due to environmental intimidation. Moreover, these frog feed on harmful insects that can kill the human. So, we have to find ways to prevent them from eradication. The reading argues three solutions to control the extinction of the frogs. The speaker cast doubt on these solutions.
The first solution, the author states that prohibiting the use of pesticides by the farm. Because of these pesticides reach the frog's habitat and kill them. The speaker claims that pint by explaining that prevent the farmers from utilizing pesticides are impossible. Besides, farmers use these pesticides to overcome the spread out of diseases between plants. And they get perfect vegetables or fruits so they could compete with other farmers. If the government restricts using the pesticides in the area where the frags are living, the farmers are negatively influenced.
The second solutions, the reading states that treating fungus that killed the frogs. The professor stats that the treatment of the frags from the fungus is a costly and complicated way to protect frags. Because the infected frag can affect the healthy one, so we have to treat each one individually.
The third solution, the author points out the wetland habitat of the frog where they are putting their eggs. And this can do by the human regulating the extra use of water. The professor claims that by telling we can not prevent the people from using water and the causes of danger on the wetland habitat are not decrease of water in that land but due to global warming. And the climate changes are the real causes of homeland destruction of the frog eggs.
Essay evaluation report
Because of these pesticides reach the frog's habitat and kill them.
Because these pesticides reach the frog's habitat and kill them.
The speaker claims that pint by explaining that prevent the farmers from utilizing pesticides are impossible.
The speaker claims that preventing the farmers from utilizing pesticides is impossible.
the reading states that treating fungus that killed the frogs.
description: can you re-write this sentence?
-------------------------
flaws:
1. No. of Words: 301 250
Write the essay in 20 minutes.
2. you still have serious grammatical issues. look at above grammar errors.
---------------------
Attribute Value Ideal
Final score: 21 in 30
Category: Good Excellent
No. of Grammatical Errors: 3 2
No. of Spelling Errors: 0 2
No. of Sentences: 19 12
No. of Words: 301 250
No. of Characters: 1473 1200
No. of Different Words: 148 150
Fourth Root of Number of Words: 4.165 4.2
Average Word Length: 4.894 4.6
Word Length SD: 2.519 2.4
No. of Words greater than 5 chars: 106 80
No. of Words greater than 6 chars: 78 60
No. of Words greater than 7 chars: 42 40
No. of Words greater than 8 chars: 32 20
Use of Passive Voice (%): 0 0
Avg. Sentence Length: 15.842 21.0
Sentence Length SD: 6.011 7.5
Use of Discourse Markers (%): 0.526 0.12
Sentence-Text Coherence: 0.294 0.35
Sentence-Para Coherence: 0.365 0.50
Sentence-Sentence Coherence: 0.094 0.07
Number of Paragraphs: 2 4
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 1, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_BEGINNING_RULE
Message: Three successive sentences begin with the same word. Reword the sentence or use a thesaurus to find a synonym.
...speaker cast doubt on these solutions. The first solution, the author states that ...
^^^
Line 2, column 128, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'frogs'' or 'frog's'?
Suggestion: frogs'; frog's
.... Because of these pesticides reach the frogs habitat and kill them. The speaker clai...
^^^^^
Line 4, column 458, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... homeland destruction of the frog eggs.
^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
besides, but, first, if, moreover, second, so, third
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 10.4613686534 76% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 5.04856512141 99% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 7.30242825607 137% => OK
Relative clauses : 11.0 12.0772626932 91% => OK
Pronoun: 24.0 22.412803532 107% => OK
Preposition: 38.0 30.3222958057 125% => OK
Nominalization: 11.0 5.01324503311 219% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1507.0 1373.03311258 110% => OK
No of words: 301.0 270.72406181 111% => OK
Chars per words: 5.00664451827 5.08290768461 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.16525528304 4.04702891845 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.60713743293 2.5805825403 101% => OK
Unique words: 154.0 145.348785872 106% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.511627906977 0.540411800872 95% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 453.6 419.366225166 108% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.55342163355 97% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 3.25607064018 61% => OK
Article: 14.0 8.23620309051 170% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 1.25165562914 240% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 4.0 1.51434878587 264% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 2.0 2.5761589404 78% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 19.0 13.0662251656 145% => OK
Sentence length: 15.0 21.2450331126 71% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 32.8701803077 49.2860985944 67% => OK
Chars per sentence: 79.3157894737 110.228320801 72% => OK
Words per sentence: 15.8421052632 21.698381199 73% => OK
Discourse Markers: 2.73684210526 7.06452816374 39% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 4.19205298013 72% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 4.33554083885 185% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 9.0 4.45695364238 202% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.27373068433 47% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.382494874007 0.272083759551 141% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.106443321752 0.0996497079465 107% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.06474408112 0.0662205650399 98% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.21009075428 0.162205337803 130% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0705267041931 0.0443174109184 159% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.1 13.3589403974 76% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 64.71 53.8541721854 120% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 5.55761589404 158% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.0 11.0289183223 73% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.48 12.2367328918 94% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.9 8.42419426049 94% => OK
difficult_words: 67.0 63.6247240618 105% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 6.5 10.7273730684 61% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.0 10.498013245 76% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 11.2008830022 71% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 85.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 25.5 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.