In the preceding argument, the author states that in order to mitigate the traffic congestion in the Zurzi city the best solution is by implementing a weekly tax for driving one's car downtown, in conclusion the author is based in the following premises. firstly, he bolsters the argument by providing Loft city methods of solutions as an vivid example of mitigating the congestion. Secondly, he claims that Loft city government raised much-needed of money to fix their roads. Hence, in the first glance it may see plausible. However, a careful scrutiny sheds light on plethora of assumptions that could undermine the value of the argument.
To begin with, the author has to corroborate his claims that in order to mitigate the congestion in th Zurzi city they have to follow the Loft city solutions. But he fails to provide evidences that will guarantee the same success by applying them. Such as the Zurzi city characteristics, what is the main cause of the congestion?, is the Loft city has a similar features for the Zurzi city. So, without complete details about the Loft area we can not draw a broad conclusion about the Zurzi state.
Second piece of evidence that the author fails to provide a reliable information about the Zurzi city economic status, perhaps they do not mind to pay the tax and will continue use their cars and the congestion will be the same. Then, the assumption lack the depth such as what is the other solutions instead taxing, what is the role of civil engineers in order to decrease the congestion. the second assumption lack a depth of details that would help to evaluate the significance of the argument.
Thirdly, the author mentions that the Loft city raised more money on their residences for fixing the roads, and it might be the direct cause for their congestion. So, he fails to give any evidence about the Zurzi roads status. Thus, linking a solution has been worked on a problem for a Loft city and applying it on the Zurzi area is not plausible because we do not have any information or details for the both cities.
In conclusion, the author fails to mention one single key factors. Namely, using Lofe city traffic solution to mitigate Zurzi congestion is not plausible and is not effective. So, without complete information the argument is unsubstantiated and opened to debate.
- tpo32 65
- Nowadays we live in very complex modern life. So, we have to do many and different task to fill our days in fruitful tasks. in spits of, others prefer doing one task in all their day long. And in my point of view doing many tasks is very important to live 60
- tpo 24 68
- Arguement: The following is a memorandum from the business manager of a television station."Over the past year, our late-night news program has devoted increased time to national news and less time to weather and local news. During this period, most of th 53
- In order for any work of art—for example, a film, a novel, a poem, or a song—to have merit, it must be understandable to most people. 50
Essay evaluation report
Attribute Value Ideal
Final score: 4.5 out of 6
Category: Good Excellent
No. of Grammatical Errors: 0 2
No. of Spelling Errors: 0 2
No. of Sentences: 16 15
No. of Words: 398 350
No. of Characters: 1882 1500
No. of Different Words: 174 200
Fourth Root of Number of Words: 4.467 4.7
Average Word Length: 4.729 4.6
Word Length SD: 2.605 2.4
No. of Words greater than 5 chars: 122 100
No. of Words greater than 6 chars: 95 80
No. of Words greater than 7 chars: 70 40
No. of Words greater than 8 chars: 40 20
Use of Passive Voice (%): 0 0
Avg. Sentence Length: 24.875 21.0
Sentence Length SD: 14.684 7.5
Use of Discourse Markers (%): 0.938 0.12
Sentence-Text Coherence: 0.36 0.35
Sentence-Para Coherence: 0.574 0.50
Sentence-Sentence Coherence: 0.11 0.07
Number of Paragraphs: 5 5
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 255, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Firstly
...hor is based in the following premises. firstly, he bolsters the argument by providing ...
^^^^^^^
Line 1, column 336, Rule ID: EN_A_VS_AN
Message: Use 'a' instead of 'an' if the following word doesn't start with a vowel sound, e.g. 'a sentence', 'a university'
Suggestion: a
...iding Loft city methods of solutions as an vivid example of mitigating the congest...
^^
Line 3, column 363, Rule ID: A_PLURAL[2]
Message: Don't use indefinite articles with plural words. Did you mean 'feature'?
Suggestion: feature
...estion?, is the Loft city has a similar features for the Zurzi city. So, without complet...
^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 391, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: The
...rs in order to decrease the congestion. the second assumption lack a depth of detai...
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, firstly, hence, however, if, may, second, secondly, so, then, third, thirdly, thus, as to, in conclusion, such as, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 19.6327345309 66% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 12.9520958084 62% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 11.1786427146 72% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 13.6137724551 59% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 25.0 28.8173652695 87% => OK
Preposition: 49.0 55.5748502994 88% => OK
Nominalization: 26.0 16.3942115768 159% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1940.0 2260.96107784 86% => OK
No of words: 398.0 441.139720559 90% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.8743718593 5.12650576532 95% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.46653527281 4.56307096286 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.69826318706 2.78398813304 97% => OK
Unique words: 182.0 204.123752495 89% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.457286432161 0.468620217663 98% => OK
syllable_count: 605.7 705.55239521 86% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.59920159681 94% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 4.96107784431 60% => OK
Article: 7.0 8.76447105788 80% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 2.70958083832 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 2.0 1.67365269461 119% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 4.22255489022 166% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 18.0 19.7664670659 91% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 22.8473053892 96% => OK
Sentence length SD: 54.4921559651 57.8364921388 94% => OK
Chars per sentence: 107.777777778 119.503703932 90% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.1111111111 23.324526521 95% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.77777777778 5.70786347227 136% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 5.15768463074 97% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 5.25449101796 76% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 8.20758483034 37% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 9.0 6.88822355289 131% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.67664670659 128% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.210280504813 0.218282227539 96% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0623380471948 0.0743258471296 84% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0662937252566 0.0701772020484 94% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.119420286713 0.128457276422 93% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.05381415197 0.0628817314937 86% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.6 14.3799401198 88% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 57.61 48.3550499002 119% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.1628742515 43% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 12.197005988 88% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.97 12.5979740519 87% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.1 8.32208582834 97% => OK
difficult_words: 85.0 98.500998004 86% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 12.3882235529 85% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 11.1389221557 97% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.9071856287 92% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 50.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.