Some people claim that public transport should be free of charge, while other disagree. Discuss both views and give your opinion.
Recently, the phenomenon of free public transportation and its corresponding impacts has sparked a heated debate. Although contested by many that the matter of providing free ticket is highly beneficial, such issue is regarded thoroughly both constructive and positive by the substantial number of individuals. I profoundly inclined to believe that using public transports should be encouraged by authorities, and this essay will examine both sides of this matter by providing some academic evidence before concluding.
From a social standpoint, enabling people of society to access cheap public transportation could have some noticeable impacts, which are rooted in the fact that reasonable subway ticket, as well as affordable public vehicles, are extremely bound up. According to an academic survey conducted by Tehran University in 2017, using student cards as a ticket card for public transport with 50% discount encourage most of the students to use these type of transportation instead of private cars. Not to mention that using urban transportation service can lead to saving some money which has many positive economic consequences.
Within the realm of traffic science and urban planning, although using free public transport can lead to decreasing air pollution and traffic jam, it has some negative side effects. Opponents of free public services are using some logical evidence to support their idea about it. Moreover, due to an academic research conducted by a prestigious institute, periodicals and maintenance services cost a lot which some part of them should be obtained from people who use these facilities, instead of using government money.
To recapitulate, I pen down saying that although some people argue about disadvantages of free public transport, I firmly tend to believe that its merits far outweigh its negative aspects; however, increasing public awareness should be considered as an important plan of governments.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2020-01-30 | Alireza.r.68 | 85 | view |
| 2019-08-02 | msgnaneswaran | 85 | view |
| 2019-08-02 | msgnaneswaran | 77 | view |
| 2019-08-02 | msgnaneswaran | 61 | view |
| 2019-08-02 | msgnaneswaran | 77 | view |
- Whether the design of the building will have a positive or negative impact on people's life and work? 77
- Some believe that it is good for a country’s culture to import films and TV programs, while others think it is better for a country to have their own films and TV programs. Discuss both views and give your own opinion. 70
- In a cashless society, people use more credit cards. What are the advantages and disadvantages of this phenomenon? 85
- Effective learning requires time, comfort and peace, so it is impossible to combine study and employment. Study and employment distract one from another. To what extent do you think the statements are realistic? Support your opinion with examples. 77
- Parents are responsible for the behavior of the children. To what extent do you agree or disagree? 88
Transition Words or Phrases used:
however, moreover, so, well, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 10.5418719212 76% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 6.10837438424 115% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 8.36945812808 72% => OK
Relative clauses : 10.0 5.94088669951 168% => OK
Pronoun: 20.0 20.9802955665 95% => OK
Preposition: 42.0 31.9359605911 132% => OK
Nominalization: 11.0 5.75862068966 191% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1661.0 1207.87684729 138% => OK
No of words: 298.0 242.827586207 123% => OK
Chars per words: 5.57382550336 5.00649968141 111% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.15483772266 3.92707691288 106% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.02688470041 2.71678728327 111% => OK
Unique words: 176.0 139.433497537 126% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.590604026846 0.580463131201 102% => OK
syllable_count: 517.5 379.143842365 136% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.57093596059 108% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 4.6157635468 87% => OK
Article: 1.0 1.56157635468 64% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 1.71428571429 175% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.931034482759 107% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 3.65517241379 137% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 12.6551724138 79% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 29.0 20.5024630542 141% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 59.3923395734 50.4703680194 118% => OK
Chars per sentence: 166.1 104.977214359 158% => OK
Words per sentence: 29.8 20.9669160288 142% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.9 7.25397266985 54% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.33497536946 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 6.9802955665 100% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 2.75862068966 72% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 2.91625615764 34% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.252005987074 0.242375264174 104% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.108801092913 0.0925447433944 118% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0399155995556 0.071462118173 56% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.167614861304 0.151781067708 110% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0228486665956 0.0609392437508 37% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 19.7 12.6369458128 156% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 33.58 53.1260098522 63% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 6.54236453202 171% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 15.8 10.9458128079 144% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.62 11.5310837438 135% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.06 8.32886699507 121% => OK
difficult_words: 94.0 55.0591133005 171% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 15.5 9.94827586207 156% => OK
gunning_fog: 13.6 10.3980295567 131% => OK
text_standard: 16.0 10.5123152709 152% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 85.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 76.5 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.