Some people claim that public transport should be free of charge, while other disagree. Discuss both views and give your opinion.
Recently, the phenomenon of free public transportation systems and its corresponding impact has sparked a heated debate. Although contested by many that the matters of people's claims are highly beneficial, such an issue is regarded thoroughly both constructive and positive by a substantial number of individuals. I am inclined to conceive that agreeing free public transport can be a plus, and I will investigate that throughout this essay.
From a social stand point, advanced transportation systems can provide the society with noticeable effects, which are rooted in the fact that merits, as well as advantages of decreasing air pollution, are visible. According to my own experience, I performed an academic experiment that discovered the importance of sophisticated transportation networks. Thus, beneficial ramifications of sensible claims are remarkable.
From a scientific point of view, free public transport can supply the community with negative impacts, which are related to the reality that demerits of inefficient infrastructure are crucial. As a tangible example, some scientific research undertaken by an elite university described irresponsible people. Hence, predicted outcomes of atrocious claims are critical.
To conclude, while there are several compelling arguments on both sides, I profoundly believe that the benefits of free public transport far outweigh its drawbacks. Not only do the advantages of moderate claims prove the significance of agreeing a free transportation system, but also pinpoint possible implications.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2020-01-30 | Alireza.r.68 | 85 | view |
| 2019-08-02 | msgnaneswaran | 85 | view |
| 2019-08-02 | msgnaneswaran | 77 | view |
| 2019-08-02 | msgnaneswaran | 61 | view |
| 2019-08-02 | msgnaneswaran | 77 | view |
- Marketing in companies should be based on reputation or short term strategies? 88
- In a cashless society, people use more credit cards. Cashless society seems to be a reality, and how realistic do you think it might be? What are the advantages and disadvantages of this phenomenon? 88
- It is important for children to study a film at school to learn literature. To what extent you agree? Give example. 88
- Effective learning requires time, comfort and peace so it is impossible to combine study and employment. Study and employment distract one from another. To what extent do you think the statements are realistic? Support your opinion with examples? 88
- Parents should be held legally responsible for their children’s acts. What is your opinion? Support it with personal examples. 88
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, hence, if, so, thus, well, while, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 10.5418719212 95% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 6.10837438424 65% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 8.36945812808 48% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 9.0 5.94088669951 151% => OK
Pronoun: 15.0 20.9802955665 71% => OK
Preposition: 26.0 31.9359605911 81% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 5.75862068966 156% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1329.0 1207.87684729 110% => OK
No of words: 226.0 242.827586207 93% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.88053097345 5.00649968141 117% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.87727950738 3.92707691288 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.36974138784 2.71678728327 124% => OK
Unique words: 147.0 139.433497537 105% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.650442477876 0.580463131201 112% => OK
syllable_count: 414.9 379.143842365 109% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.57093596059 115% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 4.6157635468 65% => OK
Article: 1.0 1.56157635468 64% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 1.71428571429 233% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 2.0 0.931034482759 215% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 3.65517241379 109% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 12.6551724138 87% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 20.5024630542 98% => OK
Sentence length SD: 47.5936658054 50.4703680194 94% => OK
Chars per sentence: 120.818181818 104.977214359 115% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.5454545455 20.9669160288 98% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.0 7.25397266985 69% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.33497536946 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 6.9802955665 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 2.75862068966 109% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 2.91625615764 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.253131863798 0.242375264174 104% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0847670065588 0.0925447433944 92% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0459006144206 0.071462118173 64% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.144044983016 0.151781067708 95% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0571408374164 0.0609392437508 94% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.5 12.6369458128 131% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 34.26 53.1260098522 64% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 6.54236453202 171% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.5 10.9458128079 123% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 16.82 11.5310837438 146% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.92 8.32886699507 131% => OK
difficult_words: 90.0 55.0591133005 163% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 15.0 9.94827586207 151% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.3980295567 96% => OK
text_standard: 17.0 10.5123152709 162% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 85.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 76.5 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.