In some regions, it is considered illegal to asses a job application by applicant’s age. However, there are some jobs that the candidate’s age is the first important factor, but generally it is a positive trend to reduce unemployment.
To begin with, the first rational justification is that not all the youth are experienced enough. Companies should assess people by their workability and proficiency. That is, there are some jobs, like accounting and computer engineering, that needs specific skills. So, rejecting people because of their age before checking their ability and experience would be the detriment for both applicants and companies. Moreover, hiring people due to their eligibility not only reduce the unemployment rate but also help companies advance sooner.
There are another group of jobs that their first and most important criteria are the employee’s age. For example, kinder garden teachers should be able to play with children and understand their needs. So, the more they are younger the more they have ability and energy to communicate better with kids. Although, in some cases there are exceptions that an elderly is more capable of taking care of children. Therefore, hiring people should be based on their ability not their age.
In conclusion, I believe that most of the jobs need their own proficiency and people should be hired as for their ability. So, refusing and assessing employee only by their age should be illicit.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 19, Rule ID: THERE_RE_MANY[3]
Message: Possible agreement error. Did you mean 'groups'?
Suggestion: groups
...es advance sooner. There are another group of jobs that their first and most impor...
^^^^^
Line 5, column 309, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “Although” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
...energy to communicate better with kids. Although, in some cases there are exceptions tha...
^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 359, Rule ID: DT_JJ_NO_NOUN[2]
Message: Probably a noun is missing in this part of the sentence.
...in some cases there are exceptions that an elderly is more capable of taking care of child...
^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, however, if, moreover, so, therefore, as for, for example, in conclusion, in some cases, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 18.0 13.1623246493 137% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 7.85571142285 89% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 10.4138276553 106% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 7.30460921844 96% => OK
Pronoun: 23.0 24.0651302605 96% => OK
Preposition: 23.0 41.998997996 55% => More preposition wanted.
Nominalization: 7.0 8.3376753507 84% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1245.0 1615.20841683 77% => OK
No of words: 235.0 315.596192385 74% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.29787234043 5.12529762239 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.91531732006 4.20363070211 93% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.91923577813 2.80592935109 104% => OK
Unique words: 132.0 176.041082164 75% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.56170212766 0.561755894193 100% => OK
syllable_count: 392.4 506.74238477 77% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 16.0 20.2975951904 79% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 24.0458745242 49.4020404114 49% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 88.9285714286 106.682146367 83% => OK
Words per sentence: 16.7857142857 20.7667163134 81% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.57142857143 7.06120827912 121% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.01903807615 60% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 8.67935871743 104% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.293638796895 0.244688304435 120% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.103826622338 0.084324248473 123% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0753540416916 0.0667982634062 113% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.190900026625 0.151304729494 126% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.040010979276 0.056905535591 70% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.9 13.0946893788 91% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 46.78 50.2224549098 93% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 11.3001002004 95% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.16 12.4159519038 106% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.6 8.58950901804 100% => OK
difficult_words: 62.0 78.4519038076 79% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 9.78957915832 107% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.4 10.1190380762 83% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
More content wanted.
Minimum 250 words wanted.
Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.