The government should ban smoking in all public places, even though this would restrict some other people's freedoms.
Do you agree or disagree?
Give reasons for your answer.
In recent years, the consumption of cigarettes in public locations is following an incremental trend. Some people support for the idea that smoking in public places should be banned, while others suppose that this would place a restriction on ones’ personal freedoms. In my opinion, smoking ban needs to be considered in many countries.
It can be clearly seen that smoking causes a great number of negative consequences to ones’ health. Most of researches illustrates that a cigarette involves in many chemicals and gases which are definitely harmful to our lungs, such as nicotine, carbon monoxide, benzene or nitrosamine. These toxicants may cause an chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, which is a condition of lungs’ respiratory limitaion, and lungs cancer in the long run. Not only causing harm to ones who directly use cigarettes, smoking in places opened for everyone affects to other people living or working in the same places called passive smoking, particularly in children and natal women. This is proven by the figure 60% of rising risk of lung cancer whether children and women are exposed with smoking gases from others.
Additionally, some people tend to litter cigarettes after using them. As the result, It is likely to bring about a serious fire, especially in a hot and dry weather; therefore properties and mankind would be suffered a loss. Besides, smoking in public locations also exacerbates the environmental pollution, via several deadly gases mentioned. The gases cause the depletion of ozone layer which protects our bodies from ultraviolet rays as well. In the decades dealing with universal pollution, everyone should reduce the repetition of consuming cigarettes in order to protect the Earth.
In conclusion, I firmly believe that the government should ban smoking for all national population’s health and international environment. Even though this may place a restriction on ones’ freedoms, the benefits of this is far higher than its disadvantages.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-07-02 | lananhle301 | 89 | view |
| 2019-07-02 | lananhle301 | 90 | view |
- Nowadays families are not as close as they used to be What do you think are the causes of this What can be done to make families closer 90
- The government should ban smoking in all public places even though this would restrict some other people s freedoms Do you agree or disagree Give reasons for your answer 85
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 106, Rule ID: MOST_SOME_OF_NNS[1]
Message: After 'Most of', you should use 'the' ('Most of the researches') or simply say ''Most researches''.
Suggestion: Most of the researches; Most researches
...tive consequences to ones' health. Most of researches illustrates that a cigarette involves i...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 319, Rule ID: EN_A_VS_AN
Message: Use 'a' instead of 'an' if the following word doesn't start with a vowel sound, e.g. 'a sentence', 'a university'
Suggestion: a
... nitrosamine. These toxicants may cause an chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, ...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, besides, may, so, therefore, well, while, in conclusion, such as, in my opinion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 13.1623246493 84% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 7.85571142285 102% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 10.4138276553 86% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 7.30460921844 123% => OK
Pronoun: 18.0 24.0651302605 75% => OK
Preposition: 41.0 41.998997996 98% => OK
Nominalization: 11.0 8.3376753507 132% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1710.0 1615.20841683 106% => OK
No of words: 313.0 315.596192385 99% => OK
Chars per words: 5.46325878594 5.12529762239 107% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.20616286096 4.20363070211 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.01443413854 2.80592935109 107% => OK
Unique words: 196.0 176.041082164 111% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.626198083067 0.561755894193 111% => OK
syllable_count: 537.3 506.74238477 106% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 20.2975951904 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 40.9446238501 49.4020404114 83% => OK
Chars per sentence: 114.0 106.682146367 107% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.8666666667 20.7667163134 100% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.66666666667 7.06120827912 80% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 8.67935871743 46% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 7.0 3.9879759519 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 3.4128256513 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.267796767858 0.244688304435 109% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.082375482376 0.084324248473 98% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0883991815101 0.0667982634062 132% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.185750944768 0.151304729494 123% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.106216407589 0.056905535591 187% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.7 13.0946893788 112% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 42.72 50.2224549098 85% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 11.3001002004 109% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.39 12.4159519038 116% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.57 8.58950901804 111% => OK
difficult_words: 98.0 78.4519038076 125% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 9.78957915832 123% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.1190380762 99% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.7795591182 93% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.