Some people prefer to focus on ambitious dreams while others think realistic goals are more important. Which do you prefer and why?
In today’s world, people always make several attempts to reach their goals and gain what they want from their lives. The major factor in becoming successful in life is the way which an individual chooses to access their goals. In this case, some people think that it is more beneficial to consider ambitious dreams to attain goals. However, in my point of view, having goals based on reality is the most important factor in being successful in most of the challenges of life.
The most considerable point to be mentioned is that if the goal is based on reality, it will help people to choose the best, and the most convenient way and materials to attain their aims. To be more specific, when someone wants to select a realistic aim, he should figure on all aspects about his skills, potential, and resources before making any decision. Therefore, he can comprehend the most efficient way of reaching the goal, and select the finest avenue. For instance, although, when I wanted to begin study to take TOEFL exam, in first sight, I wanted to take a score higher than a hundred, I understood that with the short time that I had in that period, it was not possible. Accordingly, I decided to be realistic and consider my abilities, and make a plan that will help me to take the highest score that I could. Consequently, it is important to make a goal with considering all aspects of our situations.
Another reason for this view is that when someone chooses his aims with realism, if he experiences failure in the way of attaining that goals, he will be able to understand the reasons of his failure. When someone fails in a particular task, the first thing that comes to his mind is the reasons of the failure, and just by being realistic, he will be able to comprehend the true reasons of his default. The next step after detection the causes is finding the way to solve them. To sum up, solving the problems of getting the goal provides a chance for him to try another time to reach the selected ambition.
In conclusion, with all this into account, being realistic in life, especially when we want to set our goals has an important role in being successful. Not only does it lead us to select the most convenient way to the goal, but also it makes a chance to compensate for our failures.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2022-11-26 | 57454751 | 76 | view |
| 2020-10-13 | bijan54 | 70 | view |
| 2020-08-12 | skylarzjy | 88 | view |
| 2020-08-03 | anh william | 60 | view |
| 2020-05-02 | DaVa20011218 | 70 | view |
Transition Words or Phrases used:
accordingly, also, but, consequently, first, however, if, so, therefore, for instance, in conclusion, to sum up
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 19.0 15.1003584229 126% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 9.8082437276 71% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 13.8261648746 65% => OK
Relative clauses : 16.0 11.0286738351 145% => OK
Pronoun: 50.0 43.0788530466 116% => OK
Preposition: 65.0 52.1666666667 125% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 8.0752688172 37% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1887.0 1977.66487455 95% => OK
No of words: 411.0 407.700716846 101% => OK
Chars per words: 4.59124087591 4.8611393121 94% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.50256981431 4.48103885553 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.57365265647 2.67179642975 96% => OK
Unique words: 201.0 212.727598566 94% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.489051094891 0.524837075471 93% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 573.3 618.680645161 93% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.51630824373 92% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 10.0 9.59856630824 104% => OK
Article: 4.0 3.08781362007 130% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 3.51792114695 114% => OK
Conjunction: 6.0 1.86738351254 321% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 8.0 4.94265232975 162% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 20.6003584229 78% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 25.0 20.1344086022 124% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 42.0052080104 48.9658058833 86% => OK
Chars per sentence: 117.9375 100.406767564 117% => OK
Words per sentence: 25.6875 20.6045352989 125% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.9375 5.45110844103 127% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.5376344086 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 11.8709677419 93% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.85842293907 78% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.88709677419 41% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.100517670845 0.236089414692 43% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0416112765175 0.076458572812 54% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0555561344767 0.0737576698707 75% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0699309103061 0.150856017488 46% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0501252542267 0.0645574589148 78% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.0 11.7677419355 110% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 63.02 58.1214874552 108% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.10430107527 51% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 10.1575268817 105% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.64 10.9000537634 88% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.83 8.01818996416 98% => OK
difficult_words: 77.0 86.8835125448 89% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 10.002688172 105% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.0 10.0537634409 119% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.247311828 107% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 73.3333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 22.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.