Should protect all animals or only some of them
It is widely acknowledged that wild animals are putting on the verge of extinction. Therefore, the preservation of animals is an interesting topic. However, some people argue that a few wildlife species should be conserved. This view would be valid to a certain extent, I contend that we should protect equally all animals.
The advocacy for the point of protecting some kinds of animals is understandable. The key rationale in favor of this opinion is that national budget is too meager to cover all problems of all wildlife. There are many humans issues like hunger and unemployment rampant over the world, many nations are in the desperate need of funding to revitalize the economy and raise living standard. Thus authorities need to allocate funding to a part of animals in order to put money on other urgent issues on the earth which need addressing immediately. However, this opinion is flawed because when saving some selective wild animals, it causes serious repercussion for both mankind and the environment.
Notwithstanding there are many crucial issues essential to handle, it is likely unwise to overlook the importance of all animals. Should there be one of these animals extinct, then the ecosystem would be unbalanced and it might have a catastrophic effect on the environment. Another reason is that the existence of these animals is beneficial for human beings. Scientists found out that some animals could be used as a medical treatment such as the blood of snakes which can be used to heal skin diseases. This is a testament to how devoting much attention to all kinds of animals is extremely warranted.
In conclusion, a number of people believe that we should protect all wild animals, while others think we should preserve just some of them. Both groups have their own opinions but I am convinced that we should save every wild animal that is still present in the world
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024-11-12 | Giang Tran | 67 | view |
| 2024-11-12 | Giang Tran | 67 | view |
| 2024-11-12 | Giang Tran | 84 | view |
| 2024-10-07 | Huyenlbg87 | 89 | view |
| 2024-09-07 | Tuan Harry | 78 | view |
- Car uses of three countries from 2003 to 2009 79
- If spending money on protection of animal or dealing with problems of humans 91
- Topic 11
- The table gives information about consumer spending on different items in five different countries in 2002. 73
- The responsibility for the protection of the environment is by the transnational organization or every country 92
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 387, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Thus,
... the economy and raise living standard. Thus authorities need to allocate funding to...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, however, if, look, so, still, then, therefore, thus, while, in conclusion, such as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 22.0 13.1623246493 167% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 14.0 7.85571142285 178% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 10.4138276553 48% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 12.0 7.30460921844 164% => OK
Pronoun: 27.0 24.0651302605 112% => OK
Preposition: 38.0 41.998997996 90% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 8.3376753507 120% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1579.0 1615.20841683 98% => OK
No of words: 317.0 315.596192385 100% => OK
Chars per words: 4.98107255521 5.12529762239 97% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.21953715646 4.20363070211 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.78886120452 2.80592935109 99% => OK
Unique words: 175.0 176.041082164 99% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.552050473186 0.561755894193 98% => OK
syllable_count: 506.7 506.74238477 100% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 5.43587174349 129% => OK
Article: 4.0 2.52805611222 158% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 1.0 4.76152304609 21% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 16.0721442886 100% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 20.2975951904 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 33.5296044564 49.4020404114 68% => OK
Chars per sentence: 98.6875 106.682146367 93% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.8125 20.7667163134 95% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.4375 7.06120827912 77% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.67935871743 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.9879759519 100% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 3.4128256513 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.364846481091 0.244688304435 149% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.112974028006 0.084324248473 134% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0794382296161 0.0667982634062 119% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.233266455689 0.151304729494 154% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0585997474271 0.056905535591 103% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.9 13.0946893788 91% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 52.19 50.2224549098 104% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 11.3001002004 95% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.6 12.4159519038 93% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.56 8.58950901804 100% => OK
difficult_words: 80.0 78.4519038076 102% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.0 9.78957915832 72% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.1190380762 95% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.