The first chart below gives information about the money spent by
British parents on their children’s sports between 2008 and 2014.
The second chart shows the number of children who participated in
three sports in Britain over the same time period.
The line graphs show the average monthly amount that parents in Britain
spent on their children’s sporting activities and the number of British
children who took part in three different sports from 2008 to 2014.
It is clear that parents spent more money each year on their children’s
participation in sports over the six-year period. In terms of the number of
children taking part, football was significantly more popular than athletics
and swimming.
In 2008, British parents spent an average of around £20 per month on
their children’s sporting activities. Parents’ spending on children’s sports
increased gradually over the following six years, and by 2014 the average
monthly amount had risen to just over £30.
Looking at participation numbers, in 2008 approximately 8 million British
children played football, while only 2 million children were enrolled in
swimming clubs and less than 1 million practiced athletics. The figures for football participation remained relatively stable over the following 6years. By contrast, participation in swimming almost doubled, to nearly 4
a million children and there was a nearly fivefold increase in the number of
children doing athletics.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-12-18 | abducool5 | 11 | view |
| 2019-11-01 | Evelyn_Han | 78 | view |
| 2019-08-24 | febthepotter | 84 | view |
| 2018-08-17 | Dung nguyen | 78 | view |
- The table compares the percentage of students who attended four different types of secondary schools in 2000, 2005, 2009. 67
- The average annual expenditure of college students from three countries 73
- Animals become extinct. Reasons and solutions? 84
- Should protect all animals or only some of them 42
- Car uses of three countries from 2003 to 2009 79
Transition Words or Phrases used:
if, look, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 4.0 7.0 57% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 6.8 74% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 3.15609756098 95% => OK
Pronoun: 6.0 5.60731707317 107% => OK
Preposition: 30.0 33.7804878049 89% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 3.97073170732 101% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1057.0 965.302439024 109% => OK
No of words: 184.0 196.424390244 94% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.74456521739 4.92477711251 117% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.68302321012 3.73543355544 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.14052852613 2.65546596893 118% => OK
Unique words: 108.0 106.607317073 101% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.586956521739 0.547539520022 107% => OK
syllable_count: 288.0 283.868780488 101% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.45097560976 110% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 3.0 4.33902439024 69% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.482926829268 414% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 5.0 3.36585365854 149% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0 22.4926829268 102% => OK
Sentence length SD: 43.3169640557 43.030603864 101% => OK
Chars per sentence: 132.125 112.824112599 117% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.0 22.9334400587 100% => OK
Discourse Markers: 1.875 5.23603664747 36% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 15.0 3.83414634146 391% => Less paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 3.70975609756 189% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.09268292683 24% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.391047802475 0.215688989381 181% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.183214355052 0.103423049105 177% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.107384782878 0.0843802449381 127% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.140376871784 0.15604864568 90% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0966436061684 0.0819641961636 118% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 17.1 13.2329268293 129% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 48.13 61.2550243902 79% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 10.3012195122 119% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 16.31 11.4140731707 143% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.78 8.06136585366 97% => OK
difficult_words: 35.0 40.7170731707 86% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 11.4329268293 105% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.9970731707 102% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.0658536585 108% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Maximum four paragraphs wanted.
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.