The graph below shows information on employment rates across 6 countries in 1995 and 2005.
Summarise the information by choosing and describe the main idea, and make comparisons where appropriate.
Given is a bar chart comparing the changing patterns of employment that were registered in six nations in 1995 and 2005 grouping by their genders. All in all, there was a growth in the general employment rate.
As shown in the information registered by male, the employment rate in Iceland was the highest, whereby 83% and 71% of men were hired in 1995 and 2005 respectively. Likewise, a similar growth was witnessed in Switzerland and Australia. Noteworthy is the fact that the data of UK, NewZealand and the US differed significantly in 1995, while they were practically identical at 70% in 2005.
In stark contrast, the female employment rate, however, was remarkably lower than their male counterparts. The greatest disparity was revealed in NewZealand in 1995, whereby the employment rate of women were less than a half of their male counterparts. Meanwhile, the employment ratio of women in Switzerland was persistently the highest amount six nations throughout this period.
Overall, men, to a considerable extent, were more likely to get hired from 1995 to 2005.
- The table below gives information about rail transport in four countries in 2007. 67
- The table below shows the number of medals won by the top ten countries in the London 2012 Olympic Games. 73
- The pie charts below show the average household expenditures in a country in 1950 and 2010. 84
- The chart below shows the number of men and women (in thousand) in further education in Britain in three periods and whether they were studying full-time or part-time. 78
- You should spend about 20 minutes on this task.The pie charts below show the average household expenditures in a country in 1950 and 2010.Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant. 78
Transition Words or Phrases used:
however, if, likewise, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 7.0 186% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 6.8 74% => OK
Relative clauses : 2.0 3.15609756098 63% => OK
Pronoun: 8.0 5.60731707317 143% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 28.0 33.7804878049 83% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 3.97073170732 176% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 905.0 965.302439024 94% => OK
No of words: 175.0 196.424390244 89% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.17142857143 4.92477711251 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.63713576256 3.73543355544 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.03893644124 2.65546596893 114% => OK
Unique words: 98.0 106.607317073 92% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.56 0.547539520022 102% => OK
syllable_count: 266.4 283.868780488 94% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Article: 5.0 4.33902439024 115% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.07073170732 187% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 3.36585365854 59% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 22.4926829268 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 35.4055865021 43.030603864 82% => OK
Chars per sentence: 100.555555556 112.824112599 89% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.4444444444 22.9334400587 85% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.11111111111 5.23603664747 59% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 3.70975609756 108% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.09268292683 98% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.162001041975 0.215688989381 75% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0719705891995 0.103423049105 70% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0468907059876 0.0843802449381 56% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.102929709407 0.15604864568 66% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0291180515852 0.0819641961636 36% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.6 13.2329268293 95% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 60.65 61.2550243902 99% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 10.3012195122 92% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.71 11.4140731707 111% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.73 8.06136585366 108% => OK
difficult_words: 46.0 40.7170731707 113% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 11.4329268293 101% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.9970731707 87% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.