Over the past few decades, there has been a high degree of the ambivalence over this matter whether personal development is the base for professional development.
Furthermore, this has elicited a stimulated disputation among the public. Whereas some people say that personal development does not impact professional development, I sanguinely believe that it does. This essay will further discuss reasons to support this notion and then deduce a logical conclusion.
At the outset, there are myriads of reasons to support this notion, but one of the most compelling reason is that personal development enhances the self-confidence. Therefore, it helps the individual in their professional development. Recently, new research conducted shows that individuals who invested in their personal development had performed better than the person who didn't invest in their personal development.
On the contrary, skeptics conjecture that personal development is not alone enough for professional development. Therefore, Individual should get the professional training to grow professionally. Although it seems ostensibly veridical, this is not the real picture of it. Once a person completes its personal development he can focus on the professional development.
To conclude, while there are several compelling arguments from both the sides, I profoundly believe that the benefits of personal development far outweigh its drawbacks. Not only do the advantages of doing personal development prove its significance, but also pinpoint implications of not investing in personal development.
- How widely do you think the problem spreads that people spend too much time on work than their personal life and experience time shortage? What problems it cause 55
- In a cashless society, people use more credit cards. What are the advantages and disadvantages of this phenomenon? 55
- Environment pollution is too alarming to be managed by individuals. Real change can be made at the government level. What extent do you agree or disagree. 80
- People usually mix their private and professional life.What are the pros and cons? 77
- some people work for long hours and hard to achieve success and some give importance to free time for them. give your opinion and discuss your views.nowadays, people spend too much time at work to the extent that they hardly have any time for their person 62
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 4, column 376, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: didn't
...ad performed better than the person who didnt invest in their personal development. ...
^^^^^
Line 4, column 420, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...t invest in their personal development. On the contrary, skeptics conjecture tha...
^^^^^
Line 6, column 273, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “Once” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
...al, this is not the real picture of it. Once a person completes its personal develop...
^^^^
Line 6, column 368, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... focus on the professional development. To conclude, while there are several com...
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, furthermore, if, so, then, therefore, whereas, while, on the contrary
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 10.5418719212 66% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 3.0 6.10837438424 49% => OK
Conjunction : 3.0 8.36945812808 36% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 8.0 5.94088669951 135% => OK
Pronoun: 25.0 20.9802955665 119% => OK
Preposition: 23.0 31.9359605911 72% => OK
Nominalization: 19.0 5.75862068966 330% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1359.0 1207.87684729 113% => OK
No of words: 230.0 242.827586207 95% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.90869565217 5.00649968141 118% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.89432290496 3.92707691288 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.35032374363 2.71678728327 123% => OK
Unique words: 134.0 139.433497537 96% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.582608695652 0.580463131201 100% => OK
syllable_count: 422.1 379.143842365 111% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.57093596059 115% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 4.6157635468 130% => OK
Article: 0.0 1.56157635468 0% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.71428571429 117% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.931034482759 215% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 3.65517241379 109% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 12.6551724138 103% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 20.5024630542 83% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 39.8204550332 50.4703680194 79% => OK
Chars per sentence: 104.538461538 104.977214359 100% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.6923076923 20.9669160288 84% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.15384615385 7.25397266985 85% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.12807881773 121% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 5.33497536946 75% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 6.9802955665 129% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 2.75862068966 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 2.91625615764 137% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0407860214549 0.242375264174 17% => The similarity between the topic and the content is low.
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0166944270347 0.0925447433944 18% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0263210058606 0.071462118173 37% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0294495697309 0.151781067708 19% => Maybe some paragraphs are off the topic.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0234837312649 0.0609392437508 39% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.3 12.6369458128 121% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 37.3 53.1260098522 70% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 6.54236453202 171% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 10.9458128079 112% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 16.7 11.5310837438 145% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.8 8.32886699507 106% => OK
difficult_words: 63.0 55.0591133005 114% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 9.94827586207 106% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.3980295567 85% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.5123152709 86% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
It is not exactly right on the topic in the view of e-grader. Maybe there is a wrong essay topic.
Rates: 11.1111111111 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 10.0 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.