The ability to learn more than one language will be less important in the future. Do you agree or disagree?
Recently, the phenomenon of learning more than one language and its corresponding impacts has sparked a heated debate. Although contested by many that the matter of being bilingual is highly beneficial, such issue is regarded thoroughly both constructive and positive by a substantial number of individuals. I am inclined to believe that knowing another language can be a plus, and I will analyze that throughout this essay.
From a social standpoint, acquiring knowledge about other languages can provide the society with some noticeable effects which are rooted in the fact that merits of having skills in different languages, as well as knowing more cultures, are inextricably bound up. According to my own experience, when I was a university student, I conducted an academic survey which discovered the pros of being bilingual. Thus, beneficial ramifications of both foreign languages and foreign cultures and traditions apparently can be seen.
Within the realm of science, studying new languages might increase the consequences of brain developments. Moreover, fundamental aspects of cognitive skills could relate to this reality that demerits of learning problems pertain to decreasing rate of abilities in other languages. As a tangible example, some scientific research undertaken by a prestigious university has asserted that the downside of students' weak performance is correlated negatively with low brain-based activities. Hence, it is correct to presume the preconceived the notion of learning other languages.
To conclude, while there are several compelling arguments on both sides, I profoundly believe that the benefits of learning more than one language far outweigh its drawbacks. Not only do the advantages of other communicative languages prove the significance of knowing new skills, but also pinpoint the importance of gaining knowledge about other people's life implications.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-05-26 | msgnaneswaran | 11 | view |
| 2019-04-06 | mohab.elhaddad | 85 | view |
| 2019-04-02 | foadihasan | 77 | view |
| 2019-04-01 | Fernanda Giorge | 55 | view |
| 2019-02-17 | Mahdi_Farhani | 80 | view |
- Large shopping malls are replacing small local shops in cities and towns. In your own experience is it a positive development? 85
- What do you think are the strengths and weakness of the education system in your country. Use your own experience to support your idea. 88
- The advanced medical technology has a responsibility to human’s life expectancy. Do you think it is a blessing or a curse? 88
- People emphasizing government to build an advanced transport system rather new road for vehicles that are overcrowding the cities. Do you agree or disagree? 55
- There are a lot of inventions nowadays, which invention do you think is more important in our day-to-day life. What are the benefits and detrimental effects of it? 77
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, apparently, but, hence, if, moreover, so, thus, well, while, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 10.5418719212 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 6.10837438424 98% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 8.36945812808 72% => OK
Relative clauses : 10.0 5.94088669951 168% => OK
Pronoun: 18.0 20.9802955665 86% => OK
Preposition: 38.0 31.9359605911 119% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 5.75862068966 87% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1624.0 1207.87684729 134% => OK
No of words: 285.0 242.827586207 117% => OK
Chars per words: 5.69824561404 5.00649968141 114% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.10876417139 3.92707691288 105% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.17130874218 2.71678728327 117% => OK
Unique words: 182.0 139.433497537 131% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.638596491228 0.580463131201 110% => OK
syllable_count: 510.3 379.143842365 135% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.57093596059 115% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 4.6157635468 87% => OK
Article: 1.0 1.56157635468 64% => OK
Subordination: 5.0 1.71428571429 292% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 2.0 0.931034482759 215% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 3.65517241379 109% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 12.6551724138 95% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0 20.5024630542 112% => OK
Sentence length SD: 49.2721326467 50.4703680194 98% => OK
Chars per sentence: 135.333333333 104.977214359 129% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.75 20.9669160288 113% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.41666666667 7.25397266985 88% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.33497536946 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 6.9802955665 86% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 2.75862068966 72% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 2.91625615764 137% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.239708773135 0.242375264174 99% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.078670567541 0.0925447433944 85% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0611864002274 0.071462118173 86% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.137793816899 0.151781067708 91% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0607796564988 0.0609392437508 100% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 17.3 12.6369458128 137% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 31.21 53.1260098522 59% => Flesch_reading_ease is low.
smog_index: 11.2 6.54236453202 171% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 14.6 10.9458128079 133% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 16.08 11.5310837438 139% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.48 8.32886699507 126% => OK
difficult_words: 103.0 55.0591133005 187% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.0 9.94827586207 141% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.3980295567 108% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.5123152709 114% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 88.8888888889 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 80.0 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.