Whether the design of the buildings will have a positive or negative impact on people’s life and work?
Recently, the phenomenon of the design of the buildings will have a positive or negative impact on people’s life and work and its corresponding impacts have sparked a heated debate. Although contested by many that the matter of complex procedures is highly beneficial, such issue is regarded thoroughly both constructive and consequently positive by a substantial number of individuals. I am inclined to believe that, the design of the buildings will have a positive or negative impact on people’s life and work can be a plus, and I will analyze that throughout this essay.
From a general standpoint, the design of the buildings will have a positive or negative impact on people’s life and work can provide the society with some noticeable effects which are rooted in the fact that crucial issues, as well as ultimate outcomes, are inextricably bound up. According to my own experience, when I was a university student, I performed an academic experiment which discovered current policies. Thus, beneficial ramifications of both this common phenomenon and accordingly complicated procedures apparently can be seen.
Within the realm of a public arena, the design of the buildings will have a positive or negative impact on people’s life and work might increase the consequences of critical needs. As a tangible example, some scientific research undertaken by a prestigious university has asserted that the downside of creative processes is correlated negatively with vital issues. Hence, it is correct to presume the preconceived notion of this remarkable phenomenon.
To conclude, while there are several compelling arguments on both sides, I profoundly believe that the design of the buildings will have a positive or negative impact on people’s life and work far outweigh its drawbacks. Not only do the advantages of this unique phenomenon prove the significance of total outcomes, but also pinpoint thorny issues' potential implications.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-12-29 | maninder1989 | 77 | view |
| 2019-10-10 | jashan randhawa | 55 | view |
| 2019-10-10 | jashan randhawa | 55 | view |
| 2019-08-24 | kcowz1110 | 88 | view |
| 2019-08-10 | sajid.uett | 65 | view |
- Nowadays, people spend too much time at work to the extent that they hardly have time for their personal life. Discuss 85
- Whether experimental learning can work well in formal education compared to books? Agree or disagree? 88
- In developing countries, tourism has disadvantages or advantages? 88
- As E-books are available online these days, the value of printed books has diminished. Agree or disagree? 88
- Increasing the price of fuel is the best way to decrease air pollution and traffic. To what extent do you agree or disagree? Give examples. 85
Transition Words or Phrases used:
accordingly, also, apparently, but, consequently, hence, if, so, thus, well, while, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 10.5418719212 95% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 6.10837438424 164% => OK
Conjunction : 15.0 8.36945812808 179% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 5.94088669951 151% => OK
Pronoun: 19.0 20.9802955665 91% => OK
Preposition: 35.0 31.9359605911 110% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 5.75862068966 52% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1675.0 1207.87684729 139% => OK
No of words: 305.0 242.827586207 126% => OK
Chars per words: 5.49180327869 5.00649968141 110% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.17902490978 3.92707691288 106% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.23866389616 2.71678728327 119% => OK
Unique words: 162.0 139.433497537 116% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.531147540984 0.580463131201 92% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 541.8 379.143842365 143% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.57093596059 115% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 4.6157635468 87% => OK
Article: 4.0 1.56157635468 256% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 5.0 1.71428571429 292% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 2.0 0.931034482759 215% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 3.65517241379 109% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 12.6551724138 87% => OK
Sentence length: 27.0 20.5024630542 132% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 51.1137121548 50.4703680194 101% => OK
Chars per sentence: 152.272727273 104.977214359 145% => OK
Words per sentence: 27.7272727273 20.9669160288 132% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.54545454545 7.25397266985 118% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.33497536946 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 6.9802955665 72% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 2.75862068966 181% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 2.91625615764 34% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.60952466116 0.242375264174 251% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.252160506571 0.0925447433944 272% => Sentence topic similarity is high.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.268364938153 0.071462118173 376% => The coherence between sentences is low.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.409891577593 0.151781067708 270% => Maybe some contents are duplicated.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.12818188144 0.0609392437508 210% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 18.3 12.6369458128 145% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 27.15 53.1260098522 51% => Flesch_reading_ease is low.
smog_index: 11.2 6.54236453202 171% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 16.2 10.9458128079 148% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.86 11.5310837438 129% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.95 8.32886699507 119% => OK
difficult_words: 96.0 55.0591133005 174% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.0 9.94827586207 141% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.8 10.3980295567 123% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 10.5123152709 124% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 77.7777777778 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 70.0 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.