Now doctors can talk to patients by using internet-based communication in the office. Discuss the advantages and disadvantages.
Recently, the phenomenon of communicating with doctors through video conference and its corresponding impacts has sparked a heated debate. Although contested by many that the matter of a skillful doctor is highly beneficial such issue is regarded thoroughly both constructive and positive by a substantial number of individuals. I am inclined to believe that a mental patient can be a plus and I will analyze that throughout this essay.
From a social standpoint, doctor verbal communication can provide the society with some noticeable effects which are rooted in the fact that merits of a hospital patient as well as a video conference are inextricably bound up. According to my own experience, when I was a university student, I performed an academic experiment which discovered a serious illness.Thus, beneficial ramifications of both a video technology and a good doctor apparently can be seen.
Within the realm of science, a mental patient might increase the consequences of a widespread disease. Moreover, fundamental aspects of an old cure could relate to this reality that the demerits of effective communication pertain to mass communication. As a tangible example, some scientific research undertaken by a prestigious university has asserted that the downside of direct communication is correlated negatively with contacting with doctor. Hence, it is correct to presume the preconceived notion of a traditional cure.
T o conclude, while there are several compelling arguments on both sides, I profoundly believe that the benefits of a modern cure far outweigh its drawbacks. Not only do the advantages of a bad doctor prove the significance of a video game but also pinpoint prescribing patient implications.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 363, Rule ID: SENTENCE_WHITESPACE
Message: Add a space between sentences
Suggestion: Thus
...ment which discovered a serious illness.Thus, beneficial ramifications of both a vid...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, apparently, but, hence, if, moreover, so, thus, well, while, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 10.5418719212 95% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 6.10837438424 98% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 8.36945812808 60% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 10.0 5.94088669951 168% => OK
Pronoun: 18.0 20.9802955665 86% => OK
Preposition: 33.0 31.9359605911 103% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 5.75862068966 174% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1463.0 1207.87684729 121% => OK
No of words: 268.0 242.827586207 110% => OK
Chars per words: 5.45895522388 5.00649968141 109% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.04607285448 3.92707691288 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.38291698261 2.71678728327 125% => OK
Unique words: 168.0 139.433497537 120% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.626865671642 0.580463131201 108% => OK
syllable_count: 474.3 379.143842365 125% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.57093596059 115% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 4.6157635468 87% => OK
Article: 2.0 1.56157635468 128% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 1.71428571429 233% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.931034482759 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 3.65517241379 82% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 12.6551724138 87% => OK
Sentence length: 24.0 20.5024630542 117% => OK
Sentence length SD: 48.5163344735 50.4703680194 96% => OK
Chars per sentence: 133.0 104.977214359 127% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.3636363636 20.9669160288 116% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.0 7.25397266985 96% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.33497536946 19% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 6.9802955665 100% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 2.75862068966 36% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 2.91625615764 103% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.173980260614 0.242375264174 72% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0599125756376 0.0925447433944 65% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0411451702233 0.071462118173 58% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.100665279327 0.151781067708 66% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0183605062822 0.0609392437508 30% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.5 12.6369458128 131% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 30.2 53.1260098522 57% => Flesch_reading_ease is low.
smog_index: 11.2 6.54236453202 171% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 15.0 10.9458128079 137% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.68 11.5310837438 127% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.48 8.32886699507 126% => OK
difficult_words: 96.0 55.0591133005 174% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.5 9.94827586207 146% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.3980295567 112% => OK
text_standard: 15.0 10.5123152709 143% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 85.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 76.5 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.