The table gives information about the underground railway systems in six cities. Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.
The table below compares the features of underground railway systems in different six cities: London, Paris, Tokyo, Washington DC, Kyoto and Los Angeles.
It can be clearly seen that London underground is the oldest which was opened in 1863 and Paris is the second one opened in 1900. Then this trend was followed by the opening of railway systems in Tokyo(1927), Washington DC(1976), Kyoto(1981), and the youngest one is Los Angeles(2001).
According to the table, London has the largest underground railway systems with 394 kilometres and it is used by 775 millions people per year. The seco...
- The chart below shows information about changes in average house prices in five different cities between 1990 and 2000 comparet with the average house prices in 1989. 70
- Should wealthy nations be required to share their wealth among poorer nations by providing such things as food and education? Or is it the responsibility of the governments of poorer nations to look after their citizens themselves? 70
- Creative artists should always be given the freedom to express their own ideas( in words, pictures, music or film) in whichever way they wish.There should be no government restrictions on what they do. 60
- Successful sports professionals can earn a great deal more money than people in other important professions.Some people think it is fully justified while others think it is unfair. 80
- Universities should accept equal numbers of male and female students in every subject To what extent do you agree or disagree 72
Sentence: The table below compares the features of underground railway systems in different six cities: London, Paris, Tokyo, Washington DC, Kyoto and Los Angeles.
Description: The fragment in different six is rare
Attribute Value Ideal
Score: 7.0 out of 9
Category: Good Excellent
No. of Grammatical Errors: 1 2
No. of Spelling Errors: 0 2
No. of Sentences: 9 10
No. of Words: 196 200
No. of Characters: 973 1000
No. of Different Words: 98 100
Fourth Root of Number of Words: 3.742 4.0
Average Word Length: 4.964 4.6
Word Length SD: 2.623 2.4
No. of Words greater than 5 chars: 79 60
No. of Words greater than 6 chars: 55 50
No. of Words greater than 7 chars: 34 40
No. of Words greater than 8 chars: 20 20
Use of Passive Voice (%): 0 0
Avg. Sentence Length: 21.778 21.0
Sentence Length SD: 4.131 7.5
Use of Discourse Markers (%): 0.444 0.12
Sentence-Text Coherence: 0.454 0.35
Sentence-Para Coherence: 0.691 0.50
Sentence-Sentence Coherence: 0.085 0.07
Number of Paragraphs: 4 4