Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? Telephone has greater influence on people’s lives than television has.
By and large, the 20th and 21st centuries have been characterized with all the technological advances which have had profound effects on everyone's life. A controversial question which is often raised regarding this idea is that which of the recent technologies has revolutionized people's life more. Some people are on the idea that telephone has the highest impact on one's life among all new technologies. However, some others look at this issue through a different lens and hold the view that the television plays the main role in the life revolution. As far as I am concerned, the latter belief is true. In the following paragraphs I will delve into the most outstanding reasons.
First and foremost, the great power of television stems from its way of communicating with its viewers which is related to human's vision. From psychological standpoint, the humankind is more influenced by what he sees rather than hears. Whether we like it or not, TV has positive and negative effects on people's lives. To clarify, take the example of different advertisements on TV which are broadcasted daily in different countries throughout the world. Not only are people heavily bombarded with a myriad of programs and advertisements about fast foods, drinks, clothes, and so forth, but they are also encouraged to eat, wear, and use more and more regardless of the fact that these products may not be necessarily healthy or useful. Consequently, the dominant life style of the society can change in accordance with what people see on TV. On the other side of the coin, TV programs or advertisements has the ability to encourage people to use national products and therefore, the gross domestic production (GPD) will increase which helps the sustainable development of a country. This is the procedure which cannot be carried out by any other technology such as telephone.
Another equally significant point is that the flow of information via TV is a lot faster than other sources such as telephone. By way of illustration, when watching TV, people can get the latest financial, political, and sport news. In this way, they can make their decisions based on the newest changes in the society and world. Moreover, TV programs cover a variety of fields, the entertainment programs or educational ones to name but a few. As a result, TV has an immense effect on people's conceptual framework. Once people attain well-rounded knowledge, they will be more productive members for the society. In my own experience, I saw a TV program about stock exchange which made me interested in this field. I followed this program for several weeks and got the required knowledge to enter this market and finally, my whole life changed in a way that I could not believe. This can at least partly explain why TV is more influential than telephone.
Finally yet importantly, TV can serve the society as a cultural mirror. For instance, TV programs can introduce different cultures of different groups of a nation. Or even more, they can render programs about other nations and their traditions. Consequently, the more people watch TV, the more they get familiar with national and international cultures. Another example can be the role of TV in reducing the rate of crime especially among the youngsters in the society. Some society suffer from social problems such as addiction, therefore, TV programs can make the youth aware of the consequences of such a danger. In a word, we cannot deny or ignore the massive effect of TV on individuals’ lives.
To wrap it up, contemplating all aforementioned reasons, one soon realizes that TV has more effects on people's lives than television has. The effective way of communicating with its viewers via the human's vision, the rapid flow of well-rounded information on TV programs, and the influence of TV on the culture of society are the main reasons which make me inclined toward this idea. However, it was a story in a nutshell. It is highly recommended that a survey be conducted in order to shed light on other aspects of TV's influence on people's lives.
- Burning coal in power plants produces a waste product called coal ash, a material that contains small amounts of potentially harmful chemicals Environmentalists in the United States are concerned about the damage such harmful chemicals may be doing to the 3
- Ethanol fuel, made from plants such as corn and sugar cane, has been advocated by some people as an alternative to gasoline in the United States. However, many critics argue that ethanol is not a good replacement for gasoline for several reasons.First, th 76
- Car manufacturers and governments have been eagerly seeking a replacement for the automobile's main source of power, the internal-combustion engine. By far the most promising alternative source of energy for cars is the hydrogen-based fuel-cell engine, wh 83
- Animal fossils usually provide very little opportunity to study the actual animal tissues, because in fossils the animals' living tissues have been largely replaced by minerals. Thus, scientists were very excited recently when it appeared that a 70-millio 86
- Starting in the 1960s and continuing until the 1980s, sailors in Russian submarines patrolling the North Alantic and Arctic Ocean would occasionally hear strange sounds. These underwater noises reminded the submarine crews of frog croaks, so they called t 86
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 7, column 1, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Finally,
... is more influential than telephone. Finally yet importantly, TV can serve the socie...
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, consequently, finally, first, however, if, look, may, moreover, regarding, so, therefore, well, at least, for instance, such as, as a result, by and large
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 22.0 15.1003584229 146% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 16.0 9.8082437276 163% => OK
Conjunction : 26.0 13.8261648746 188% => OK
Relative clauses : 18.0 11.0286738351 163% => OK
Pronoun: 44.0 43.0788530466 102% => OK
Preposition: 90.0 52.1666666667 173% => OK
Nominalization: 14.0 8.0752688172 173% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 3405.0 1977.66487455 172% => OK
No of words: 682.0 407.700716846 167% => Less content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.9926686217 4.8611393121 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 5.11029644095 4.48103885553 114% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.97301736042 2.67179642975 111% => OK
Unique words: 335.0 212.727598566 157% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.491202346041 0.524837075471 94% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 1053.0 618.680645161 170% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.51630824373 99% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 11.0 9.59856630824 115% => OK
Article: 12.0 3.08781362007 389% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 3.0 3.51792114695 85% => OK
Conjunction: 6.0 1.86738351254 321% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 10.0 4.94265232975 202% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 34.0 20.6003584229 165% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 20.1344086022 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 51.4484406131 48.9658058833 105% => OK
Chars per sentence: 100.147058824 100.406767564 100% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.0588235294 20.6045352989 97% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.85294117647 5.45110844103 89% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.53405017921 110% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.5376344086 18% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 14.0 11.8709677419 118% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.85842293907 104% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 16.0 4.88709677419 327% => Less facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.126658668334 0.236089414692 54% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0345073800145 0.076458572812 45% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0365765172149 0.0737576698707 50% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0836144596649 0.150856017488 55% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0418026543003 0.0645574589148 65% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.1 11.7677419355 103% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 59.64 58.1214874552 103% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 10.1575268817 97% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.66 10.9000537634 107% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.4 8.01818996416 105% => OK
difficult_words: 163.0 86.8835125448 188% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 10.002688172 120% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.0537634409 99% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.247311828 117% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Write the essay in 30 minutes.
Rates: 73.3333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 22.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.