It is better to have friends who are intelligent or to have friends who have a sense of humor.
People often possess different viewpoints on whether intelligent friends are better than humorous friends. Based on my personal experience and observation of life, I tend to suggest that having friends with intelligence is more beneficial than having friends with sense of humor. I will elaborate my view points in my ensuing essay.
First, I care about my academic achievement and intelligent friends can help me get good grade. For example, I earned degree in physical therapy, my friend helped me a lot to graduate this course. My smart friend used to share their notes and tell me how to prepare for the tests to help me have better academic performance. Accordingly, I believe that having intelligent friends is more helpful.
Secondly, I want to run a start-up of my career by opening a physical therapy center in my home town. My intelligent friends can help me build excellent start-up team. For instance, to have best team to run a physical therapy center is necessary. I need to find talented people, who are willing to work in this department. Therefore, I asked my friend who is already running a physical therapy center. However, if I humorous friends to help me in this case then I want be able to open successful physical therapy center.
Lastly, I love to learn English and I can learn a lot from my intelligent friends. To elaborate, I have some friends who can speak in English fluently. Hence, I often ask them to speak in English with me, as to practice my English speaking. Furthermore, they would not be reluctant to give me useful feedback like structure, grammar and even they encourage me to do better. On the other hand, if I talk to friends who have sense of humor, I think my English will not improve because they cannot tell whether there is any drawback in my English speaking. In fact, they might laugh at my English speaking and I will be frustrated. Consequently, I would like to hang out with intelligent friends instead of friends with sense of humor.
To conclude, friend with intelligence can help in academic, career, important decisions and many more. Whereas, friend with humor can make our life euphoric but it will not be helpful eventually. I prefer to have friend with intelligence who can really help me in difficult turns of my life.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-03-07 | persepolistmm | 70 | view |
| 2019-03-07 | persepolistmm | 70 | view |
| 2018-09-25 | ankitapatel | 70 | view |
| 2018-09-24 | ankitapatel | 66 | view |
- The extended family (grandparents, cousins, aunts, and uncles) is less important now than it was in the past. Do you agree or dis agree with the statement? use specific example and details to explain your reasons. 66
- It is more important to keep old friends than it is to make new friends 60
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? Grades encourage students to learn. Use specific example and reasons to explain your opinion 70
- Summarize points made in the lecture and how it cast doubt pints made in the reading passage.On February 15th, 1898, the USS Moline Sank of the coast of Havana, Cuba. More than two hundred and officers on board died as a result of an explosion, which many 3
- Some people think that human needs for farmland housing and industry are more important than saving land for endangered animals Do you agree or disagree with this point of view Why or why not Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer 76
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 213, Rule ID: HAVE_PART_AGREEMENT[1]
Message: Use past participle here: 'friended'.
Suggestion: friended
...be helpful eventually. I prefer to have friend with intelligence who can really help m...
^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
accordingly, but, consequently, first, furthermore, hence, however, if, lastly, really, second, secondly, so, then, therefore, whereas, as to, for example, for instance, i think, in fact, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 15.1003584229 73% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 16.0 9.8082437276 163% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 13.8261648746 58% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 7.0 11.0286738351 63% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 58.0 43.0788530466 135% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 60.0 52.1666666667 115% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 8.0752688172 111% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1892.0 1977.66487455 96% => OK
No of words: 394.0 407.700716846 97% => OK
Chars per words: 4.80203045685 4.8611393121 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.45527027702 4.48103885553 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.76230297212 2.67179642975 103% => OK
Unique words: 194.0 212.727598566 91% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.492385786802 0.524837075471 94% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 586.8 618.680645161 95% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.51630824373 99% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 19.0 9.59856630824 198% => OK
Article: 0.0 3.08781362007 0% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 3.51792114695 85% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.86738351254 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.94265232975 101% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 23.0 20.6003584229 112% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 20.1344086022 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 30.7167682019 48.9658058833 63% => OK
Chars per sentence: 82.2608695652 100.406767564 82% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.1304347826 20.6045352989 83% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.91304347826 5.45110844103 164% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.53405017921 110% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.5376344086 18% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 21.0 11.8709677419 177% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 3.85842293907 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.88709677419 41% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.399454274312 0.236089414692 169% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.143919371849 0.076458572812 188% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.12318075588 0.0737576698707 167% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.268300489735 0.150856017488 178% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0551496015484 0.0645574589148 85% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 9.7 11.7677419355 82% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 62.68 58.1214874552 108% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.10430107527 51% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.7 10.1575268817 86% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.26 10.9000537634 94% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.37 8.01818996416 92% => OK
difficult_words: 72.0 86.8835125448 83% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 10.002688172 85% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.0537634409 88% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.247311828 88% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 66.6666666667 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 20.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.