venus planet and human life generation at planetThe lecture and the reading are both discussing about the planet venus and how to develop life at venus planet. The author in reading is against the ideas of developing
human life at venus but the lecturer supports the dieas of developing life at venus planet. The lecturer arugues and gives its three ideas in support by following means.
in reading the author mentions that mainatining a permanent human presence on venus is very difficult due to few very importnat reasons.
Firstly, author states that the atmospphiric pressure on planet venus is too high like 100kg is pressing every square cm of surface, and space aircrafts are also destroyed when they were landed on venus. While the lecturer argues on this statement and refutes the statement of author by saying that the atmopsheric pressure 50 kg is not too high on high altitudes it gets low so there will be no pressure while going up at venus surface and there will be no danger to the space crafts while landing on the planets surface.
secondly, the author claims that there is no water, on the venus but co2, nitrogen and sulphuric acid is present and hardly oxygen, on the other hand the lecturer refutes this idea of the author and states that co2 and sulphuric acids can be used for human's survival.
thirdly, the author mentions that sunlight cannot reach at venus surface due to heavy clouds and it reflects back the 60% sunlight so thats why no electricity can be generatded at venus, on the other hand lecturere refutes this ideas and states that if the sunlight which reflects back even can be used for the electricity and can be used in generation of electricity.
The lecture and the reading are both discussing the planet Venus and how to develop life at venus planet. The author in reading is against the ideas of developing
human life at venus but the lecturer supports the ideas of developing life at venus planet. The lecturer argues and gives its three ideas in support by following means.
in reading the author mentions that maintaining a permanent human presence on Venus is very difficult due to a few very important reasons.
Firstly, the author states that the atmospheric pressure on planet Venus is too high like 100kg is pressing every square cm of the surface, and space aircraft are also destroyed when they were landed on Venus. While the lecturer argues on this statement and refutes the statement of author by saying that the atmospheric pressure 50 kg is not too high on high altitudes it gets low so there will be no pressure while going up at Venus surface and there will be no danger to the space crafts while landing on the planet's surface.
secondly, the author claims that there is no water, on the venus but co2, nitrogen and sulphuric acid is present and hardly oxygen, on the other hand the lecturer refutes this idea of the author and states that co2 and sulphuric acids can be used for human's survival.
thirdly, the author mentions that sunlight cannot reach at Venus surface due to heavy clouds and it reflects back the 60% sunlight so that's, why no electricity can be generatded at venus, on the other hand lecturere, refutes this idea and states that if the sunlight which reflects back even can be used for the electricity and can be used in generation of electricity.
- teaching methods 70
- supervisor and its qualities 60
- venus planet and human life generation at planetThe lecture and the reading are both discussing about the planet venus and how to develop life at venus planet. The author in reading is against the ideas of developinghuman life at venus but the lecturer s 70
- professors are good to appear on TV or not. 73
- learning and understanding the facts have importance. 66
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 93, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_BEGINNING_RULE
Message: Three successive sentences begin with the same word. Reword the sentence or use a thesaurus to find a synonym.
...eas of developing life at venus planet. The lecturer argues and gives its three ide...
^^^
Line 3, column 1, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: In
...e ideas in support by following means. in reading the author mentions that mainta...
^^
Line 7, column 1, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Secondly
...hile landing on the planets surface. secondly, the author claims that there is no wat...
^^^^^^^^
Line 9, column 1, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Thirdly
...ids can be used for humans survival. thirdly, the author mentions that sunlight cann...
^^^^^^^
Line 9, column 135, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: that's
...nd it reflects back the 60% sunlight so thats, why no electricity can be generatded a...
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, firstly, if, second, secondly, so, third, thirdly, while, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 16.0 10.4613686534 153% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 5.04856512141 139% => OK
Conjunction : 15.0 7.30242825607 205% => Less conjunction wanted
Relative clauses : 9.0 12.0772626932 75% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 14.0 22.412803532 62% => OK
Preposition: 34.0 30.3222958057 112% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 5.01324503311 80% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1370.0 1373.03311258 100% => OK
No of words: 288.0 270.72406181 106% => OK
Chars per words: 4.75694444444 5.08290768461 94% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.11953428781 4.04702891845 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.42375039396 2.5805825403 94% => OK
Unique words: 134.0 145.348785872 92% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.465277777778 0.540411800872 86% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 426.6 419.366225166 102% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.55342163355 97% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 3.25607064018 0% => OK
Article: 6.0 8.23620309051 73% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.25165562914 80% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.51434878587 66% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 2.5761589404 155% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 13.0662251656 61% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 36.0 21.2450331126 169% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 98.6032929217 49.2860985944 200% => The lengths of sentences changed so frequently.
Chars per sentence: 171.25 110.228320801 155% => OK
Words per sentence: 36.0 21.698381199 166% => OK
Discourse Markers: 11.625 7.06452816374 165% => OK
Paragraphs: 6.0 4.09492273731 147% => Less paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 5.0 4.19205298013 119% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 4.33554083885 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 4.45695364238 67% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.27373068433 23% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.515784442647 0.272083759551 190% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.298512861284 0.0996497079465 300% => Sentence topic similarity is high.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.291637780575 0.0662205650399 440% => The coherence between sentences is low.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.328279348943 0.162205337803 202% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.26581532534 0.0443174109184 600% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 19.0 13.3589403974 142% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 43.4 53.8541721854 81% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 5.55761589404 158% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 16.2 11.0289183223 147% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.92 12.2367328918 89% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.38 8.42419426049 99% => OK
difficult_words: 54.0 63.6247240618 85% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 10.7273730684 98% => OK
gunning_fog: 16.4 10.498013245 156% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.2008830022 98% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Maximum four paragraphs wanted.
Rates: 70.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 21.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.