Would you prefer to live in a traditional house or in a modern apartment building? Use specific reasons and details to support your choice.
Considering living in a traditional house or in a modern apartment building, I strongly incline to take the side of living in the modern apartment building. Being one of the controversial issue among family members, the selection of an appropriate place for living is considered as a critical social subject. Admittedly, a modern building apartment associated with some facilities which can be ascribed as the technology applications in the construction. However, to elaborate more on the topic mentioned, the following reasons and examples will be presented.
First and foremost, to construct a modern house, a new kind of materials is applied to increase the strengthen of the house. For instance, by using the nanotechnology in the cement, the building resistance to any possible shocks such as earth quakes increases noticeably. In addition, the new applied material prevent possible heat loss from the building. Thus, the living in a modern house provide cost efficient case for inhabitants.
Another advantage of a modern apartment building can be contributed to the convenient in the little space with the lower energy consumption. For example, in a traditional house, the expense of some convenient such as pool are remarkable. It is also worth nothing that, in addition to the substantial consumption of water, cleaning and disinfection, and maintaining cost for providing a pool in a traditional house, the huge space of the house should be occupied. By contrary, the modern house can provide a pool with appropriate space, water recycling, suitable heat management as well as the cost efficiency.
Aside from the point I made above, the modern house provides more security compared with a traditional house. For instance, the use of special camera and the capability of internet, everyone can check the security situation of their house even from long distances. Although, this facility can be installed in traditional houses, the default design of a modern house considers this point.
Taking all these perspectives into account, I cannot agree more about the more advantages of living in a modern apartment building compared with a traditional house regarding the associated benefits such as building resistance, the appropriate facilities, and security. Even though, the living in the modern apartment building involve considering some rules to prevent any bothersome for neighbors, the crucial role of technology in construction of a modern apartment building can be attributed as a prefect solution for that.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-11-05 | alta | 70 | view |
| 2019-06-23 | Reet_@ | 75 | view |
| 2018-09-25 | mardanpour | 84 | view |
| 2018-06-07 | jonitagandhi | 60 | view |
| 2018-06-07 | jonitagandhi | 60 | view |
- You have decided to give several hours of your time each month to improve the community where you live. What is the one thing you will do to improve your community? Why? Use specific reasons and details to explain your choice. 76
- If you could change one important thing about your hometown what would you change Use reasons and specific examples to support your answer 80
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement In order to become financially responsible adults children should learn to manage their own money at a young age Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer 73
- Learning about the past has no value for those of us living in the present. Do you agree or disagree? Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer. 70
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? Watching television is bad for children. Use specific details and examples to support your answer. 81
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 97, Rule ID: A_INFINITVE[1]
Message: Probably a wrong construction: a/the + infinitive
...ind of materials is applied to increase the strengthen of the house. For instance, by using th...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, however, regarding, so, then, thus, well, for example, for instance, in addition, kind of, such as, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 15.1003584229 73% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 9.8082437276 92% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 13.8261648746 51% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 3.0 11.0286738351 27% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 10.0 43.0788530466 23% => OK
Preposition: 56.0 52.1666666667 107% => OK
Nominalization: 22.0 8.0752688172 272% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2142.0 1977.66487455 108% => OK
No of words: 395.0 407.700716846 97% => OK
Chars per words: 5.42278481013 4.8611393121 112% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.45809453852 4.48103885553 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.11276504107 2.67179642975 117% => OK
Unique words: 192.0 212.727598566 90% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.486075949367 0.524837075471 93% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 683.1 618.680645161 110% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.51630824373 112% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 9.59856630824 42% => OK
Article: 16.0 3.08781362007 518% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 1.0 3.51792114695 28% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 1.86738351254 107% => OK
Preposition: 9.0 4.94265232975 182% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 20.6003584229 83% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 23.0 20.1344086022 114% => OK
Sentence length SD: 53.5018028348 48.9658058833 109% => OK
Chars per sentence: 126.0 100.406767564 125% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.2352941176 20.6045352989 113% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.52941176471 5.45110844103 138% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.53405017921 110% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.5376344086 18% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 11.8709677419 93% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.85842293907 78% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.88709677419 61% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.266706685099 0.236089414692 113% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0940362566226 0.076458572812 123% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0663771792526 0.0737576698707 90% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.164284831568 0.150856017488 109% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0545940874527 0.0645574589148 85% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.7 11.7677419355 133% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 39.67 58.1214874552 68% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 6.10430107527 183% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.4 10.1575268817 132% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.45 10.9000537634 133% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.25 8.01818996416 115% => OK
difficult_words: 112.0 86.8835125448 129% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 10.002688172 120% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.0537634409 111% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.247311828 117% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.3333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 22.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.