In many years, many pieces of research show that the people who always keep the beautiful moments in their mind, they would have the longer lifespan than the others. However, having some parts of the world think that positive thinking still exists many negatives. In this essay will consider and analyze the two views mentioned above in depth.
To begin with, it is fact that the people who have positive thinking have many advantages, in general, to mention when they work. First of all, they are normally dynamic and full of energy. It means that they work with a lot of passion and enthusiasm. They always look at things in the good ways and finding the positive parts in all the disadvantages things because of that, they will overcome the troubles, solve the problems easily and getting back their good emotions faster. Moreover, their thinking not only helps themselves but also bring the comfortable working environment to colleagues.
As regards the second view, it seems this view is not more justified. As a matter of fact, the people who always make everything in the serious ways of thinking, they will feel extremely heavy and uncomfortable. With them, most of the work will become hard to carry out and they feel scary or worry when have to face troubles. Besides that, if their mind may not opening, it will have a huge impact on their health. According to the doctor, they always advise their patients to keep their head in a state of relaxation. Only with the way of thinking may contribute many best things the humanlife.
To sum up, people should be given the opportunity to themselves and trying to look all parts by the positive thinking. However, in some case of natural life, they also need to learn how to look at the fact of matters and update for themselves the knowledge and experience to reduce the problems.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, besides, but, first, however, if, look, may, moreover, second, so, still, thus, as regards, in general, as a matter of fact, first of all, to begin with, to sum up
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 4.0 13.1623246493 30% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 7.85571142285 127% => OK
Conjunction : 12.0 10.4138276553 115% => OK
Relative clauses : 11.0 7.30460921844 151% => OK
Pronoun: 33.0 24.0651302605 137% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 48.0 41.998997996 114% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 8.3376753507 48% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1527.0 1615.20841683 95% => OK
No of words: 319.0 315.596192385 101% => OK
Chars per words: 4.7868338558 5.12529762239 93% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.22617688928 4.20363070211 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.42630393737 2.80592935109 86% => OK
Unique words: 173.0 176.041082164 98% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.542319749216 0.561755894193 97% => OK
syllable_count: 459.0 506.74238477 91% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.60771543086 87% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 12.0 5.43587174349 221% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 10.0 4.76152304609 210% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 16.0721442886 100% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 20.2975951904 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 44.5812110087 49.4020404114 90% => OK
Chars per sentence: 95.4375 106.682146367 89% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.9375 20.7667163134 96% => OK
Discourse Markers: 10.5625 7.06120827912 150% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 8.67935871743 127% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.9879759519 100% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0866681202155 0.244688304435 35% => The similarity between the topic and the content is low.
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0329977493291 0.084324248473 39% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0397256161115 0.0667982634062 59% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0635751342569 0.151304729494 42% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0308608057138 0.056905535591 54% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.1 13.0946893788 85% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 69.11 50.2224549098 138% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.3 11.3001002004 73% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.5 12.4159519038 85% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.8 8.58950901804 91% => OK
difficult_words: 65.0 78.4519038076 83% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 7.5 9.78957915832 77% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.1190380762 95% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 10.7795591182 74% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.