The reality people often encounter shifts an individual's experience. It is ironic to think an experience itself is affected by their past experience. However, considering how the past experiences distort, transform and misrepresent the reality people perceive. It seems clear that experiences can make differences in people's perspective. To prove one's perspective true, one should be able to justify his or her viewpoint and overcome objections.Though many people see this issue as the best way to travel is in a group led by tourist, my perspective is that the best way to travel is in a group by themselves because freely traveling can look around what I want to see and has no limits for the time.
To begin with, freely traveling can experience what I want to go. When I was a little child, I went trip at the school with the guide. I can get many knowledge about what I went, but I can't go around what I want to go. It had such a huge influence on me that freely traveling is the best way to travel.
In addition, freely traveling has no time limits, so it allows us to look around and go back whenever we want. When my father was a little child, my father had no reasonable time at the trip because of its time limitation. So he felt boring about the trip. The example clearly illustrates that time limitations make people's travel boring.
Truth must settle at some point; one perspective survives, and the rest subsides into history. In such a case, man must ceaselessly refine his view until it is finally accepted as truth. I have corroborated my perspective on this topic disagreement with limitations. It is time for a settlement.
Votes
Essay reference notes: This topic is refereed from another essay topic, developed by user: iPass
Essay Categories
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 13, Rule ID: MASS_AGREEMENT[2]
Message: Possible agreement error - use third-person verb forms for singular and mass nouns: 'peoples'.
Suggestion: peoples
The reality people often encounter shifts an individuals e...
^^^^^^
Line 1, column 134, Rule ID: PAST_EXPERIENCE_MEMORY[1]
Message: Use simply 'experience'.
Suggestion: experience
... experience itself is affected by their past experience. However, considering how the past expe...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 1, column 180, Rule ID: PAST_EXPERIENCE_MEMORY[1]
Message: Use simply 'experiences'.
Suggestion: experiences
...xperience. However, considering how the past experiences distort, transform and misrepresent the...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 1, column 348, Rule ID: ONES[1]
Message: Did you mean 'one's'?
Suggestion: one's
...rences in peoples perspective. To prove ones perspective true, one should be able to...
^^^^
Line 1, column 446, Rule ID: SENTENCE_WHITESPACE
Message: Add a space between sentences
Suggestion: Though
...r her viewpoint and overcome objections.Though many people see this issue as the best ...
^^^^^^
Line 2, column 145, Rule ID: MANY_FEW_UNCOUNTABLE[2]
Message: Use 'much' or 'little' with uncountable nouns.
Suggestion: much; little
...at the school with the guide. I can get many knowledge about what I went, but I cant...
^^^^
Line 2, column 145, Rule ID: MANY_NN_U[1]
Message: Possible agreement error. The noun knowledge seems to be uncountable; consider using: 'much knowledge', 'a good deal of knowledge'.
Suggestion: much knowledge; a good deal of knowledge
...at the school with the guide. I can get many knowledge about what I went, but I cant go around...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 2, column 185, Rule ID: CANT[1]
Message: Did you mean 'can't' or 'cannot'?
Suggestion: can't; cannot
...many knowledge about what I went, but I cant go around what I want to go. It had suc...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, finally, however, if, look, so, in addition, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 15.1003584229 73% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 9.8082437276 71% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 13.8261648746 51% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 6.0 11.0286738351 54% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 36.0 43.0788530466 84% => OK
Preposition: 38.0 52.1666666667 73% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 8.0752688172 111% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1356.0 1977.66487455 69% => OK
No of words: 289.0 407.700716846 71% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.69204152249 4.8611393121 97% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.12310562562 4.48103885553 92% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.89957139554 2.67179642975 109% => OK
Unique words: 156.0 212.727598566 73% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.539792387543 0.524837075471 103% => OK
syllable_count: 431.1 618.680645161 70% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.51630824373 99% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 9.0 9.59856630824 94% => OK
Article: 2.0 3.08781362007 65% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 3.51792114695 85% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 1.86738351254 107% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.94265232975 101% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 20.6003584229 83% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 17.0 20.1344086022 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 70.3044294676 48.9658058833 144% => OK
Chars per sentence: 79.7647058824 100.406767564 79% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.0 20.6045352989 83% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.70588235294 5.45110844103 68% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 8.0 5.5376344086 144% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 11.8709677419 76% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 3.85842293907 130% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.88709677419 61% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.116284008777 0.236089414692 49% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0335396802631 0.076458572812 44% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0465974858925 0.0737576698707 63% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0666527931289 0.150856017488 44% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0366609544768 0.0645574589148 57% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 9.2 11.7677419355 78% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 62.68 58.1214874552 108% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.10430107527 51% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.7 10.1575268817 86% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.63 10.9000537634 88% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.43 8.01818996416 93% => OK
difficult_words: 54.0 86.8835125448 62% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 10.002688172 115% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.0537634409 88% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.247311828 88% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
We are expecting: No. of Words: 350 while No. of Different Words: 200
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 60.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 18.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.