Successful sports star and glamorous film stars are a role model for youngsters. Do you support or not?
Recently, an appropriate role model for young people has sparked an ongoing controversy, which inevitably leads to a moot question “are successful sportsmen and film stars are a good role model for youngsters?”. Whereas it is a widely held view that it can be beneficial, I will discuss controversial aspects of that throughout this essay.
From individual standpoint, being successful person is bound up inextricably with having a good role model, which indicates they lead to both prominent figures and a source of inspiration. As a well-known example, a longitudinal study conducted by eminent scientists in 2014 demonstrates the relationship between future prosperity, high income, and exponential increase in popularity. Their academic criticism was impressive. Consequently, my empirical evidence presented thus far supports the contention that the likelihood of individual triumph is correlated positively with not only following eminent figures but also imitating prosperous sportsmen’s behavior.
Within the realm of creativity, innovation attribute to following blindly, in that it would come down to homogeneous society and boring environment. A salient example of such attribution is a devoted admirer, which is a cause for concern since it was mistaken to take idolatry for granted. Had there been a paradigm shift earlier, scholars might have had the opportunity to pinpoint ethical problems. Likewise, hardly had the confined their attention to advertising illegal things, misbehavior, and even suiside. Hence, it is reasonable to infer the pivotal role of having unique way in the life.
To conclude, as for myself, as the saying goes “all’s well that ends well” after what elaborated above. I entirely agree that professional athletes and superstars can be role model for adolescents. However, we conceive that the more we research, the further we discover.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-10-20 | smb.arami | 88 | view |
| 2018-10-04 | AliGolbaz | 88 | view |
| 2018-09-25 | hchandra | 88 | view |
| 2018-06-28 | Mohammad1364 | 88 | view |
| 2018-06-28 | Mohammad1364 | 77 | view |
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, consequently, hence, however, if, likewise, so, thus, well, whereas, as for
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 10.5418719212 133% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 6.10837438424 82% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 8.36945812808 84% => OK
Relative clauses : 10.0 5.94088669951 168% => OK
Pronoun: 23.0 20.9802955665 110% => OK
Preposition: 31.0 31.9359605911 97% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 5.75862068966 139% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1631.0 1207.87684729 135% => OK
No of words: 285.0 242.827586207 117% => OK
Chars per words: 5.72280701754 5.00649968141 114% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.10876417139 3.92707691288 105% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.34068625767 2.71678728327 123% => OK
Unique words: 196.0 139.433497537 141% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.687719298246 0.580463131201 118% => OK
syllable_count: 513.0 379.143842365 135% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.57093596059 115% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 4.6157635468 130% => OK
Article: 4.0 1.56157635468 256% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 4.0 1.71428571429 233% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 2.0 0.931034482759 215% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 5.0 3.65517241379 137% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 12.6551724138 111% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 20.5024630542 98% => OK
Sentence length SD: 56.3558301495 50.4703680194 112% => OK
Chars per sentence: 116.5 104.977214359 111% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.3571428571 20.9669160288 97% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.14285714286 7.25397266985 85% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.33497536946 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 6.9802955665 158% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 2.75862068966 36% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 2.91625615764 69% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.184342591458 0.242375264174 76% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0474571900698 0.0925447433944 51% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0750559353662 0.071462118173 105% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.104980103561 0.151781067708 69% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0734748348587 0.0609392437508 121% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.7 12.6369458128 124% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 34.26 53.1260098522 64% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 6.54236453202 171% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.5 10.9458128079 123% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.9 11.5310837438 138% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.61 8.32886699507 127% => OK
difficult_words: 108.0 55.0591133005 196% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 15.5 9.94827586207 156% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.3980295567 96% => OK
text_standard: 16.0 10.5123152709 152% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 88.8888888889 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 80.0 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.