The chart below shows the number of students from four different countries, applying to a European university.
Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.
The bar chart compares the amount of applicants, who come from China, Japan, USA and Russia, for one university of Europe from 2004 to 2008.
It is clear that Chinese is the primary source of international applicants between 2004 and 2006, but USA became the largest origin of overseas candidate from 2006 to 2008. USA saw the biggest rise over the five years.
In 2004, over 28 thousand Chinese candidates applied for European universities, which fell to 25 thousand in the year of 2005 and 2006. And the decrease continues in the following two years, reaching to 20 thousand in 2007, which is equal to the number of USA in the year of 2004. Over the five years, however, USA saw a stable rise in the applicant number, overtaking China from 2006, and closed to 30 thousand in 2008.
From 2004 to 2008, both Japan and Russia saw an increase of students applied for studying abroad with an exception in 2005 of Russia. The figures for Japan and Russia rose to approximately 10 thousand and 7 thousand from 7 thousand and 25 hundred, respectively.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2020-12-04 | Singhfilms | 67 | view |
- The chart below show the reasons why some people want to leave the UK and work in other countries and why some people want to stay in the UK Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 66
- Some people want the government to spend money looking for other life on other planets, but others think it is a waste of public money, because there are many problems need to be solved on the earth.Discuss both views and give your own opinion. 78
- Art classes like painting and drawing are important to students’ development and they should be compulsory in high school.To what extent do you agree or disagree? 67
- the chart below shows global sales of the top five mobile phone brands between 2009 and 2013. 78
- The chart below shows the number of students from four different countries applying to a European university Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 78
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, however, so
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 3.0 7.0 43% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 6.8 147% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 3.15609756098 127% => OK
Pronoun: 2.0 5.60731707317 36% => OK
Preposition: 36.0 33.7804878049 107% => OK
Nominalization: 1.0 3.97073170732 25% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 871.0 965.302439024 90% => OK
No of words: 184.0 196.424390244 94% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.73369565217 4.92477711251 96% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.68302321012 3.73543355544 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.59260777512 2.65546596893 98% => OK
Unique words: 99.0 106.607317073 93% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.538043478261 0.547539520022 98% => OK
syllable_count: 248.4 283.868780488 88% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 2.0 4.33902439024 46% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 3.0 0.482926829268 621% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 3.36585365854 119% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0 22.4926829268 102% => OK
Sentence length SD: 34.2889832891 43.030603864 80% => OK
Chars per sentence: 108.875 112.824112599 96% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.0 22.9334400587 100% => OK
Discourse Markers: 2.0 5.23603664747 38% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 3.70975609756 135% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.09268292683 73% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0851484450849 0.215688989381 39% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0416162810654 0.103423049105 40% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0247781062162 0.0843802449381 29% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0565305407105 0.15604864568 36% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0214755649001 0.0819641961636 26% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.3 13.2329268293 93% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 65.05 61.2550243902 106% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 10.3012195122 96% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.45 11.4140731707 92% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.47 8.06136585366 105% => OK
difficult_words: 43.0 40.7170731707 106% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.4329268293 96% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.9970731707 102% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.0658536585 99% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.