The chart below shows the number of students from four different countries applying to a European university Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant

The given graph gives us the information about the candidates who had applied to a UK university from European nations, the Middle East, the Far East and Africa from the period of 1999 to 2003. It is apparant that Africa had the lowest student number throughtout the years while applying a UK university.

In 1999, 30,000 applicants who were applying were from Europeans states and 10,000 were from Middle east and !5,000 of applicants that had applied to the university were from Far East and Africa had the lowest number of candidates with around 3,000 individuals. From 1999 to 2002 the number of applicants had been fluctuating. Till 2003, the number of students from Europeans Countries had gone down to almost 12,000 whereas, students from Middle East got interested in the UK university with 20,000 candidates. the figures of students from Far East rose radically to 30,000, which was the peak of it. Meanwhile, Africa had always been at the bottom.

Overall, Even though, students from Europeans Nations had lost their interest in the UK university but the students from other countries got more attracted to the university except Africa.

Votes
Average: 6.7 (1 vote)
Essays by the user:

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 513, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: The
...e UK university with 20,000 candidates. the figures of students from Far East rose ...
^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, whereas, while

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 7.0 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 6.8 74% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 3.15609756098 158% => OK
Pronoun: 6.0 5.60731707317 107% => OK
Preposition: 36.0 33.7804878049 107% => OK
Nominalization: 1.0 3.97073170732 25% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 963.0 965.302439024 100% => OK
No of words: 190.0 196.424390244 97% => OK
Chars per words: 5.06842105263 4.92477711251 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.71268753763 3.73543355544 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.60451876659 2.65546596893 98% => OK
Unique words: 94.0 106.607317073 88% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.494736842105 0.547539520022 90% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 274.5 283.868780488 97% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 5.0 4.33902439024 115% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.07073170732 187% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 3.36585365854 89% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0 22.4926829268 102% => OK
Sentence length SD: 70.1737798255 43.030603864 163% => OK
Chars per sentence: 120.375 112.824112599 107% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.75 22.9334400587 104% => OK
Discourse Markers: 2.375 5.23603664747 45% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 3.0 3.83414634146 78% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 3.70975609756 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 1.13902439024 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.09268292683 73% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.209241611727 0.215688989381 97% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.110125886304 0.103423049105 106% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0594648452038 0.0843802449381 70% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.173078497806 0.15604864568 111% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0155760985729 0.0819641961636 19% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.3 13.2329268293 108% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 65.05 61.2550243902 106% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 10.3012195122 96% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.42 11.4140731707 109% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.77 8.06136585366 96% => OK
difficult_words: 36.0 40.7170731707 88% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.5 11.4329268293 127% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.9970731707 102% => OK
text_standard: 15.0 11.0658536585 136% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.