"Euthanasia is no longer acceptable in the modern society.” Discuss the solutions to accept this fact.

One of the most conspicuous trends of today's world is the colossal upsurge in the Euthanasia. There is a widespread worry that this will only lead to a myriad of concerns in the society. In my opinion, Euthanasia has more negative impacts than positives in the society.

On the one hand, critics may point out that one of the most significant benefits of Euthanasia is to get relief from a painful life of untreatable severe patient. For example, whole body paralyzed grandpa, unlike the past, now have an option to die by self will, as he no more need to live rest of his life in pain, thanks to new law.

On the other hand, there are several arguments in favour of my stance. One of the most preponderant ones is that Euthanasia has negative consequences for dependable family members in various ways. Firstly, the old parents and children will suffer hardship for hand to mouth, such as in countries not having strong social security. According to "Times Magazine December 2017 edition", the proportion of death by self will have dropped down from 30 percent to 10 percent today. Secondly, a large portion of depressed person will choose to suicide because of the new law providing Euthanasia lawful.

Lastly, in my opinion, the government of Australia is taking great initiatives in educating its nationals against the negative impacts of the Euthanasia. Citizens are being encouraged to find new way of caring such patients, to compensate for childrens getting rid of grandparents love and affection.

In view of the arguments outlined above, one can conclude that despite having some benefits, the drawbacks of Euthanasia in the society are indeed too dire to ignore.

Votes
Average: 8.8 (1 vote)
Essay Categories

Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, firstly, if, lastly, may, second, secondly, so, for example, such as, in my opinion, on the other hand

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 10.5418719212 85% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 6.10837438424 131% => OK
Conjunction : 2.0 8.36945812808 24% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 4.0 5.94088669951 67% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 11.0 20.9802955665 52% => OK
Preposition: 54.0 31.9359605911 169% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 5.75862068966 87% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1416.0 1207.87684729 117% => OK
No of words: 282.0 242.827586207 116% => OK
Chars per words: 5.02127659574 5.00649968141 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.09790868904 3.92707691288 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.80418213618 2.71678728327 103% => OK
Unique words: 171.0 139.433497537 123% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.606382978723 0.580463131201 104% => OK
syllable_count: 448.2 379.143842365 118% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.57093596059 102% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 4.6157635468 0% => OK
Article: 5.0 1.56157635468 320% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 1.0 1.71428571429 58% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.931034482759 0% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 3.65517241379 192% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 12.6551724138 103% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 20.5024630542 102% => OK
Sentence length SD: 33.017836313 50.4703680194 65% => OK
Chars per sentence: 108.923076923 104.977214359 104% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.6923076923 20.9669160288 103% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.38461538462 7.25397266985 116% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.12807881773 121% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.33497536946 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 6.9802955665 57% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 8.0 2.75862068966 290% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 2.91625615764 34% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.113193104626 0.242375264174 47% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0393236069773 0.0925447433944 42% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0340543239255 0.071462118173 48% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0594992121872 0.151781067708 39% => Maybe some paragraphs are off the topic.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0394319037615 0.0609392437508 65% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.1 12.6369458128 104% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 50.16 53.1260098522 94% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.54236453202 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 10.9458128079 105% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.84 11.5310837438 103% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.82 8.32886699507 106% => OK
difficult_words: 74.0 55.0591133005 134% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 9.94827586207 116% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.3980295567 100% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.5123152709 114% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 88.8888888889 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 80.0 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.