Modern societies need specialists in certain fields, but not in others.
Some people therefore think that governments should pay university fees for students who study subjects that are needed by society. Those who choose to study less revelant subjects should not receive governmet funding.
Would the advantages of such edicational policy outweigh the disadvantages?
In the modern times, the specialization in many crucial fields is becoming more pressing than ever before. There are some who argue that students studying in the important disciplines, which are likely to be more useful than others, should be received grants from the governments for progressing and, of course, those who involved in less noteworthy subjects would be not. In my view, however, this practice would be reconsidered carefully owning to many drawbacks.
It is true that supporting for students who specializing in many dominated subjects could certain benefits. There are, for example, much more experts with the intensive training who could contribute significantly for the societies in many crucial areas as a result. Nevertheless, measure like this also leads to a great deal of undesirable consequences for disadvantaged individuals in particular and for the societies as a whole.
One clear limitation would be that those who generally have less prosperity could not have the chance to pursuing their ambitions. In other words, this practice would be a huge obstacle preventing students from their interesting areas that they want to follow. For example, young people who participating in uncommon subjects could be never received supporting form schools and governments. Eventually, it could be even that, these students could cope with many difficulties in finding employments in unwanted fields in the future.
Another significant shortcoming could be the increasing in social divides. Like for instance, rich and wise students who tend to be good at the important subjects could always received scholarships and are likely to succeed in their future life. While on the other hand, those who are at disadvantaged have to choose unpopular disciplines without supporting form others could have less incidence of success. Consequently, they would be left further and further behind in turn contributing to social isolations.
Overall, in my view, the emphasis of supporting solely for students involving in important subjects could have some fruitful results; however, these are likely to be negligible and easily outweighed by the disadvantages.
- Some experts believe that it is better for children to begin learning a foreign language at primary school rather than secondary school.Do the advantages of this outweigh the disadvantages? 53
- The table below shows the results of survey to find out what members of a city sprots club think about the club's activities, facilities and opening hours.Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make any comparisions wh 80
- In many countries, the proportion of older people is steadily increasing. Does this trend have positive or negative effects on society? 88
- some people believe that unpaid community service should be a compulsory part of high shcool programmes ( for example working for a charity, improving the neighbourhood or teaching sports to younger children.To what exatent do you agree or disagree. 83
- The two maps below show an island, before and after the construction of some tourist facilities.Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisions where relevant. 55
Sentence: It is true that supporting for students who specializing in many dominated subjects could certain benefits.
Description: A WH-pronoun, nominative is not usually followed by a verb, present participle or gerund
Suggestion: Refer to who and specializing
Description: A modal auxillary is not usually followed by an adjective
Suggestion: Refer to could and certain
Sentence: For example, young people who participating in uncommon subjects could be never received supporting form schools and governments.
Description: A WH-pronoun, nominative is not usually followed by a verb, present participle or gerund
Suggestion: Refer to who and participating
Attribute Value Ideal
Score: 7.0 out of 9
Category: Good Excellent
No. of Grammatical Errors: 3 2
No. of Spelling Errors: 0 2
No. of Sentences: 15 15
No. of Words: 334 350
No. of Characters: 1791 1500
No. of Different Words: 172 200
Fourth Root of Number of Words: 4.275 4.7
Average Word Length: 5.362 4.6
Word Length SD: 2.959 2.4
No. of Words greater than 5 chars: 130 100
No. of Words greater than 6 chars: 103 80
No. of Words greater than 7 chars: 83 40
No. of Words greater than 8 chars: 54 20
Use of Passive Voice (%): 0 0
Avg. Sentence Length: 22.267 21.0
Sentence Length SD: 8.054 7.5
Use of Discourse Markers (%): 0.733 0.12
Sentence-Text Coherence: 0.357 0.35
Sentence-Para Coherence: 0.593 0.50
Sentence-Sentence Coherence: 0.069 0.07
Number of Paragraphs: 5 5