Modern societies need specialists in certain fields, but not in others.
Some people therefore think that governments should pay university fees for students who study subjects that are needed by society. Those who choose to study less revelant subjects should not receive governmet funding.
Would the advantages of such edicational policy outweigh the disadvantages?
In the modern times, the specialization in many crucial fields is becoming more pressing than ever before. There are some who argue that students studying in the important disciplines, which are likely to be more useful than others, should be received grants from the governments for progressing and, of course, those who involved in less noteworthy subjects would be not. In my view, however, this practice would be reconsidered carefully owning to many drawbacks.
It is true that supporting for students who specializing in many dominated subjects could certain benefits. There are, for example, much more experts with the intensive training who could contribute significantly for the societies in many crucial areas as a result. Nevertheless, measure like this also leads to a great deal of undesirable consequences for disadvantaged individuals in particular and for the societies as a whole.
One clear limitation would be that those who generally have less prosperity could not have the chance to pursuing their ambitions. In other words, this practice would be a huge obstacle preventing students from their interesting areas that they want to follow. For example, young people who participating in uncommon subjects could be never received supporting form schools and governments. Eventually, it could be even that, these students could cope with many difficulties in finding employments in unwanted fields in the future.
Another significant shortcoming could be the increasing in social divides. Like for instance, rich and wise students who tend to be good at the important subjects could always received scholarships and are likely to succeed in their future life. While on the other hand, those who are at disadvantaged have to choose unpopular disciplines without supporting form others could have less incidence of success. Consequently, they would be left further and further behind in turn contributing to social isolations.
Overall, in my view, the emphasis of supporting solely for students involving in important subjects could have some fruitful results; however, these are likely to be negligible and easily outweighed by the disadvantages.
- Some people say that the best way to improve public health is by increasing the number of sports facilities. Others, however, say that this would have little effect on public health and that other measures are required. 73
- The tables below show people s reasons for giving up smoking and when they intend to give up summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisions where relevant 60
- In many countries today insufficient repect is shown to older people.What do you think may be the reason for this?What problems might this cause in society? 70
- The chart below shows the total number of minutes in billions of telephone calls in the UK divided into three categories from 1995 2002 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 87
- Every year several languages die out. Some people think that this is not important because life will be easier if there are fewer languages in the world.To what extent do you agree or disagree with this opinion. 64
Sentence: It is true that supporting for students who specializing in many dominated subjects could certain benefits.
Description: A WH-pronoun, nominative is not usually followed by a verb, present participle or gerund
Suggestion: Refer to who and specializing
Description: A modal auxillary is not usually followed by an adjective
Suggestion: Refer to could and certain
Sentence: For example, young people who participating in uncommon subjects could be never received supporting form schools and governments.
Description: A WH-pronoun, nominative is not usually followed by a verb, present participle or gerund
Suggestion: Refer to who and participating
Attribute Value Ideal
Score: 7.0 out of 9
Category: Good Excellent
No. of Grammatical Errors: 3 2
No. of Spelling Errors: 0 2
No. of Sentences: 15 15
No. of Words: 334 350
No. of Characters: 1791 1500
No. of Different Words: 172 200
Fourth Root of Number of Words: 4.275 4.7
Average Word Length: 5.362 4.6
Word Length SD: 2.959 2.4
No. of Words greater than 5 chars: 130 100
No. of Words greater than 6 chars: 103 80
No. of Words greater than 7 chars: 83 40
No. of Words greater than 8 chars: 54 20
Use of Passive Voice (%): 0 0
Avg. Sentence Length: 22.267 21.0
Sentence Length SD: 8.054 7.5
Use of Discourse Markers (%): 0.733 0.12
Sentence-Text Coherence: 0.357 0.35
Sentence-Para Coherence: 0.593 0.50
Sentence-Sentence Coherence: 0.069 0.07
Number of Paragraphs: 5 5