Do you agree or disagree?People learn things better from at their own level, such as co-workers, students, than from those at higher level, such as teachers, and supervisiors.
Nowadays education is the most significant thing in this world. The world is progressing, and we need educated people to keep continue retain the balance of the everyrhing in society. Also educated people will provide the serenity, but to do all of them they need to fulfill their tasks, or job succesfully. This goes through a well education, learning. Sometimes it şs difficult to understand and solve the problem, at that time we might need help. There is an argument states that people learn things better from their own level than higher level. I disagree with that, and strongly believe people learn things better from higher level than their own level for two reasons. In the following of the essay I will explain those two reasons.
Firstly, the reason mention to be is we need to learn the things from the expert of the topic. If we want to learn and improve ourselves about a subject it is better to learn that from the expert, because they are the master, they know the core points of the subject. People might thing it will be hard to understand from them, because of high technical language, however if will get the things truly from them, there is no chance to misunderstand them. For example, I had a dilemma about my calculus course and I ask my friend a question, I thought he understood the subject, and can teach me. However, after him I also asked to my professor, and it emerged my friend totally misunderstood the subject. I went to him and corrected, taught him the true. Thus, it is always better to learn things from the higher level, because they are the masters they can teach you truly.
Furthermore, the other reason is professor and teacher also know how to teach. People state higher levels do not know how to get the listeners level, but it is not true. For instance, in my country all of the teacher, and even professors from universities they take courses about how to teach, and convey the true information easily to the listeners. Hence, it is better to learn things from higher levels, since they are aware of how to teach, and reach listeners level.
In nut shell, I believe it is better to learn things from higher levels, such as professors, and teachers, because they are the expert of the topic, so there is no chance to learn, or get a wrong information. Additionally, they take courses about how to teach and convey the information, according to listeners level.
- Do you agree or disagree In twenty years there will be fewer cars in use than there are today 76
- Do you agree or disagree? Life is today easier and more comfortable than when your grandparents were a children. 70
- Do you agree or disagree?People today spend to much time on personal enjoyment doing things they like to do rather then they should do. 73
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? Students are more influenced by their teachers than by their friends. 66
- Do you agree or disagree? A person should never make an important decision alone. 60
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 185, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Also,
...e balance of the everyrhing in society. Also educated people will provide the sereni...
^^^^
Line 5, column 199, Rule ID: ALL_OF_THE[1]
Message: Simply use 'all the'.
Suggestion: all the
...s not true. For instance, in my country all of the teacher, and even professors from unive...
^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, firstly, furthermore, hence, however, if, so, thus, well, for example, for instance, such as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 18.0 15.1003584229 119% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 12.0 9.8082437276 122% => OK
Conjunction : 18.0 13.8261648746 130% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 11.0286738351 36% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 55.0 43.0788530466 128% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 56.0 52.1666666667 107% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 8.0752688172 124% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1994.0 1977.66487455 101% => OK
No of words: 425.0 407.700716846 104% => OK
Chars per words: 4.69176470588 4.8611393121 97% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.54043259262 4.48103885553 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.52121791846 2.67179642975 94% => OK
Unique words: 193.0 212.727598566 91% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.454117647059 0.524837075471 87% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 593.1 618.680645161 96% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.51630824373 92% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 10.0 9.59856630824 104% => OK
Article: 3.0 3.08781362007 97% => OK
Subordination: 7.0 3.51792114695 199% => OK
Conjunction: 12.0 1.86738351254 643% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 8.0 4.94265232975 162% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 21.0 20.6003584229 102% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 20.1344086022 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 43.4452244596 48.9658058833 89% => OK
Chars per sentence: 94.9523809524 100.406767564 95% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.2380952381 20.6045352989 98% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.2380952381 5.45110844103 96% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.5376344086 36% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 12.0 11.8709677419 101% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.85842293907 104% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.88709677419 102% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.366914401334 0.236089414692 155% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.112290419786 0.076458572812 147% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.126674391142 0.0737576698707 172% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.226408507631 0.150856017488 150% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.072891835102 0.0645574589148 113% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.8 11.7677419355 92% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 68.1 58.1214874552 117% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.10430107527 51% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.7 10.1575268817 86% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.92 10.9000537634 91% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.49 8.01818996416 93% => OK
difficult_words: 77.0 86.8835125448 89% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.5 10.002688172 75% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.0537634409 99% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.247311828 98% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 70.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 21.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.