The best ideas arise from a passionate interest in commonplace things.
Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the statement and explain your reasoning for the position you take. In developing and supporting your position, you should consider ways in which the statement might or might not hold true and explain how these considerations shape your position.
Unearthing what is unknown to the human conscious is the most interesting occupation of our species. Until now, in order to go beyond what is seen to our eyes in our mundane lives; we sent space crafts to space, we delved into the Earth with nails kilometers long, we set off with the biggest ships to discover new worlds. All were because of our passion to elicit one more unknown fact and share it with the other people. Without the element of passion, Einstein would not spend 10 years of his life just focusing on his theory of relativity or Galileo would not spend years of his life observing the atmosphere. Moreover, this passionate interest is what puts them forward in the realm of science; for example, when he was a tyro, Tesla was able to criticize Edison's choice of direct current, advising him to replace them with the alternating current. Even though his suggestion was not taken into consideration by Edison -by Edison's misfortune- it shows us that passionate interest opens up new paths to people and differentiates them.
As human species, we have been around the Earth for approximately 130,000 years. During this time we discovered many things, and I almost thoroughly share the author's belief that, the best ideas arise from enthusiastic people focused on particular subjects, especially the subjects with which we as Jane and John Doe's, are quite familiar. For example, the beverage billions of people drink today, Coca Cola was first produced as a medicine for a headache. After the new regulation which was banning such products for health, the inventor of Coca Cola turned the beverage into a more regular, simpler one. He produced a very simple drink including sugar, cafeinne and carbon dioxide and came up with the beverage the whole world is obsessed with today. His success aroused from the simplicity and using quite common ingredients. The result was tremendously successful.
Moreover, one another example to the success from an interest in commonplace things belongs to Mark Zuckerberg. The idea of Facebook was at first place just an interface enabling the Harvard students to communicate with each other more easily. It was such a spartan and unfurnished idea, like any other friendship sites we see every day. However, with right way of branding and advertisement, his interest in a new way of communication appealed to the billions of people all around the world and Facebook today has enormous success.
Even though Einstein's, Galileo's, Newton's or many other scientists' success verifies the author's commentary about "passionate interest", their work was not particularly dealing with mundane issues or commonplace things. In this case, does it dispatch them from their thrones of science? Of course not! Einstein's theory of relativity is acknowledged as the base of physics today and is of course revered as one of the best ideas a human being has ever came up with. However, it did not arise from his interest in commonplace things. In this case, I contradict with the author's claim. The best ideas are not always the product of ordinary or common issues.
As a result, I agree the author's claim asserting that the best ideas are the products of passionate interests. However, even though the best ideas are sometimes achieved by looking at the commonplace things with a different perspective, it is not always the case. There are many successful scientists who dealt with fields which are clearly not commonplace such as maths, physics, astronomy for many years and put forth valuable ideas, and their ideas are certainly among the best ones.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024-11-18 | ekarumeblessing@icloud.com | 66 | view |
| 2024-11-10 | hhj | 66 | view |
| 2024-11-09 | KLH | 66 | view |
| 2024-10-31 | ekarumeblessing@icloud.com | 79 | view |
| 2024-10-29 | batterylow_123 | 58 | view |
- Essay topics: Educators should base their assessment of students' learning not on students' grasp of facts but on the ability to explain the ideas, trends, and concepts that those facts illustrate.Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which 66
- Company X has just switched to a 4-day workweek, mandating that employees work 10 hours per day from Monday to Thursday instead of 8 hours per day from Monday to Friday. Although the policy is new, Company X claims that the policy will help to increase pr 63
- The Workforce Challenge 89
- If two applicants for a job are otherwise equally qualified, the job should go to the applicant with more experience. Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the statement and explain your reasoning for the pos 66
- As people rely more and more on technology to solve problems, the ability of humans to think for themselves will surely deteriorate.Discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the statement and explain your reasoning for the position you take. 58
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 4, column 160, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'authors'' or 'author's'?
Suggestion: authors'; author's
...ings, and I almost thoroughly share the authors belief that, the best ideas arise from ...
^^^^^^^
Line 6, column 407, Rule ID: IN_A_X_MANNER[1]
Message: Consider replacing "in a new way" with adverb for "new"; eg, "in a hasty manner" with "hastily".
...randing and advertisement, his interest in a new way of communication appealed to the billio...
^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 8, column 56, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'scientists'' or 'scientist's'?
Suggestion: scientists'; scientist's
...steins, Galileos, Newtons or many other scientists success verifies the authors commentary...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 8, column 88, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'authors'' or 'author's'?
Suggestion: authors'; author's
...y other scientists success verifies the authors commentary about 'passionate inter...
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, however, if, look, moreover, so, thus, for example, of course, such as, as a result
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 27.0 19.5258426966 138% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 2.0 12.4196629213 16% => OK
Conjunction : 17.0 14.8657303371 114% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 11.3162921348 71% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 45.0 33.0505617978 136% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 86.0 58.6224719101 147% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 12.9106741573 70% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 3012.0 2235.4752809 135% => OK
No of words: 596.0 442.535393258 135% => OK
Chars per words: 5.05369127517 5.05705443957 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.94096258147 4.55969084622 108% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.73237830032 2.79657885939 98% => OK
Unique words: 304.0 215.323595506 141% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.510067114094 0.4932671777 103% => OK
syllable_count: 936.9 704.065955056 133% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.59117977528 101% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 14.0 6.24550561798 224% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Article: 6.0 4.99550561798 120% => OK
Subordination: 8.0 3.10617977528 258% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 2.0 1.77640449438 113% => OK
Preposition: 10.0 4.38483146067 228% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 26.0 20.2370786517 128% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 23.0359550562 96% => OK
Sentence length SD: 62.883850854 60.3974514979 104% => OK
Chars per sentence: 115.846153846 118.986275619 97% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.9230769231 23.4991977007 98% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.46153846154 5.21951772744 66% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 7.80617977528 51% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 19.0 10.2758426966 185% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 5.13820224719 39% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.83258426966 103% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.174258145006 0.243740707755 71% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0525164064163 0.0831039109588 63% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0377700456619 0.0758088955206 50% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.11146734983 0.150359130593 74% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0393703259298 0.0667264976115 59% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.8 14.1392134831 98% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 49.15 48.8420337079 101% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 12.1743820225 98% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.31 12.1639044944 101% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.57 8.38706741573 102% => OK
difficult_words: 145.0 100.480337079 144% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.5 11.8971910112 113% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 11.2143820225 96% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 11.7820224719 119% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 83.33 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.