Learning a new language at an early age is helpful for children. Is it more positive for their future aspect or have some adverse effects? Agree or disagree?
Recently, learning a new language at early ages has sparked an ongoing controversy, which inevitably leads to a moot question " is it positive for children's' future or not?". Whereas, it is a widely held view that studying a foreign language is helpful for children. I will discuss the controversial aspects of that throughout this essay.
From the communicative standpoint, speaking a foreign language is bound up inextricably with building new relationships, which indicates they lead to both increased self-confidence and communication skills. As a well-known example, a longitudinal study conducted by eminent scientists demonstrates the relationship between idea expressions and sharing thoughts as well as an exponential increase in job opportunities. Their academic criticism was impressive. Consequently, my empirical evidence presented thus far supports the contention that the likelihood of having a prosperous future is positively correlated with not only international connections but also being multi-lingual.
Within the realm of education, without the slightest doubt, studying new language attribute to improved performance. A salient example of such attribution is school assessments, which is a cause of concern since it was mistaken to take a single course for granted. Had there been a paradigm shift earlier, scholars have had the opportunity to pinpoint educational system problems. Likewise, hardly had they confined their attention to studying abroad, overseas courses and even native language. Hence, it is correct to infer the pivotal role of linguistical skills.
To conclude, as for myself, as the saying goes "all's well that ends well," after analyzing what elaborated above, I entirely agree that learning a new language at early ages has a positive influence on children's' future. However, with the benefit of hindsight, we conceive the more we research, the further we discover.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-04-05 | foadihasan | 80 | view |
| 2018-12-04 | arami | 85 | view |
| 2018-10-22 | brandnewiman | 88 | view |
| 2018-05-06 | jagadeeshjimmy | 71 | view |
| 2018-03-06 | maryam2 | 88 | view |
- The three pie charts below show the changes in annual spending by a particular UK school in 1981 1991 and 2001 Summerise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant
- The advanced medical technology has a responsibility to human’s life expectancy. Do you think it is a blessing or a curse? 88
- Formal examinations are the only effective way to assess a student's performance. Continual assessment such as coursework and projects is not a satisfactory way to do this. 11
- Large shopping malls are replacing small local shops in cities and towns. In your own experience, is it a positive development? 88
- Some people indicate that certain kind of music can promote learning for young children while many researchers showed that results are mixed What is your opinion Use your own experience and observation 58
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 7, column 78, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma
Suggestion: , &apos
...ying goes 'alls well that ends well,' after analyzing what elaborated above,...
^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, consequently, hence, however, if, likewise, so, thus, well, whereas, as for, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 10.5418719212 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 6.10837438424 16% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 8.36945812808 60% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 8.0 5.94088669951 135% => OK
Pronoun: 21.0 20.9802955665 100% => OK
Preposition: 32.0 31.9359605911 100% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 5.75862068966 174% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1651.0 1207.87684729 137% => OK
No of words: 287.0 242.827586207 118% => OK
Chars per words: 5.75261324042 5.00649968141 115% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.11595363751 3.92707691288 105% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.33234414133 2.71678728327 123% => OK
Unique words: 193.0 139.433497537 138% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.672473867596 0.580463131201 116% => OK
syllable_count: 508.5 379.143842365 134% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.57093596059 115% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 4.6157635468 152% => OK
Article: 3.0 1.56157635468 192% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 1.71428571429 233% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.931034482759 0% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 3.65517241379 164% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 12.6551724138 111% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 20.5024630542 98% => OK
Sentence length SD: 60.6838579216 50.4703680194 120% => OK
Chars per sentence: 117.928571429 104.977214359 112% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.5 20.9669160288 98% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.0 7.25397266985 96% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.33497536946 19% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 6.9802955665 158% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 2.75862068966 36% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 2.91625615764 69% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.329398078498 0.242375264174 136% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0867973407368 0.0925447433944 94% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0982416438062 0.071462118173 137% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.191733218851 0.151781067708 126% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.120895590413 0.0609392437508 198% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.9 12.6369458128 126% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 34.26 53.1260098522 64% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 6.54236453202 171% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.5 10.9458128079 123% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 16.07 11.5310837438 139% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.57 8.32886699507 127% => OK
difficult_words: 108.0 55.0591133005 196% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.5 9.94827586207 126% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.3980295567 96% => OK
text_standard: 16.0 10.5123152709 152% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 88.8888888889 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 80.0 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.