The tables below give information abou sales of Fairtrade*-labelled coffee and bananas in 1999 and 2004 in five European countries.
Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.
The two tables provide the sales status of Fairtrade labelled coffee and bananas among five European countries in 1999 and 2004.
As can be seen from the tables, the sales of bananas far exceeded that of coffee, especially in Switzerland, who consumed the most bananas than the other countries, while UK preferred to consume more coffee than the others. Moreover, the sales of these two products saw an increase over the five years, except Sweden and Denmark, whose sales on bananas went to downward trend.
As of coffee sales, UK had a sharp increase about 13 times in 2004, amounted to 20 million euros, over that in 1999. Similarly, Switzerland also doubled its sales of coffee from 3 million euros in 1999 to 6 million euros in 2004. Other countries also saw an upper trend, though less significantly, which are Denmark, Belgium, and Sweden.
As of bananas sales, Switzerland outstood all the other countries shown in the table, accounted for 15 million in 1999, later more than tripled in 2000. By contrast, the other countries’ sales figures on bananas are much insignificant, less than 6 million euros altogether in 1999, later in 2000 not even exceeding 12 million euros. More interestingly, while the other three countries are adding value on its banana sales, Sweden and Demark saw a drastic decline by 80% (Sweden) and 55% (Demark).
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-02-28 | suhandhini | 10 | view |
| 2018-10-24 | satsatieltsielts | 80 | view |
- The tables below give information abou sales of Fairtrade*-labelled coffee and bananas in 1999 and 2004 in five European countries.Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant. 84
- The diagrams below show the life cycle of a species of large fish called the salmon Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 84
- IELTS 6 Test 2 Writing Task 2 Academic Successful sports professionals can earn a great deal more money than people in other important professions Some people think this is fully justified while others think it is unfair Discuss both of these views and gi 76
- The charts below show what UK graduate and postgraduate students who did not go into full time work did after leaving college in 2008 59
- The first chart below shows how energy is used in an average Australian household. The second chart shows the greenhouse gas emissions which result from this energy use. Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comp 45
Comments
The tables illustrate sales
The tables illustrate sales of Fairtrade in coffee and bananas in five European countries (UK, Switzerland, Denmark, Belgium, and Sweden) in 1999 and 2004. Units collected in millions of euros.
Overall, UK has the most coffee sales in both 1999 and 2004 (with 1.5 millions euros and 20 millions euros, respectively). On the other hand, Switzerland has the highest sales in bananas with 15 millions euros (1999) and 47 millions euros (2004).
While both UK and Switzerland have extremely high Fairtrade sales, Belgium, Sweden, and Denmark Fairtrade sales are quiet low. Denmark in 1999 sales only 108 millions euros of coffee and 2 millions euros of bananas, while in 2004 sales only 2 millions euros of coffee and 0.9 millions euros of bananas.
Belgium has the second lowest sale ( 1 million euros-1999- and 1.7 millions euros-2004- for coffee and 0.6 millions euros-1999- and 4 millions euros-2004- for bananas). Having merely 0.8 (1999) and 1 millions euros (2004) sales in coffee make Sweden has the lowest number of sale and also almost the lowest sale in bananas with 1.8 (1999) and 1 million euros (2004).
Discourse Markers used:
['also', 'if', 'moreover', 'similarly', 'so', 'while']
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance in Part of Speech:
Nouns: 0.246212121212 0.268076937826 92% => OK
Verbs: 0.094696969697 0.116061578633 82% => OK
Adjectives: 0.0530303030303 0.0759168565197 70% => OK
Adverbs: 0.0643939393939 0.0366838410393 176% => OK
Pronouns: 0.00757575757576 0.0131127313244 58% => OK
Prepositions: 0.155303030303 0.155750635184 100% => OK
Participles: 0.0189393939394 0.0379272487307 50% => Some participles wanted.
Conjunctions: 2.60891274644 2.65546596893 98% => OK
Infinitives: 0.0151515151515 0.0210936926555 72% => OK
Particles: 0.0 0.00175180941692 0% => OK
Determiners: 0.0719696969697 0.0948980150116 76% => OK
Modal_auxiliary: 0.00378787878788 0.00437022459523 87% => OK
WH_determiners: 0.0113636363636 0.00967000014798 118% => OK
Vocabulary words and sentences:
No of characters: 1354.0 1161.00487805 117% => OK
No of words: 226.0 196.9 115% => OK
Chars per words: 5.99115044248 5.90752243213 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.87727950738 3.73763899035 104% => OK
words length more than 5 chars: 0.358407079646 0.337110787985 106% => OK
words length more than 6 chars: 0.261061946903 0.247514529752 105% => OK
words length more than 7 chars: 0.159292035398 0.171178102325 93% => OK
words length more than 8 chars: 0.0973451327434 0.112407865282 87% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.60891274644 2.65546596893 98% => OK
Unique words: 126.0 106.607317073 118% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.557522123894 0.546246751206 102% => OK
Word variations: 52.9542283384 49.3433353143 107% => OK
How many sentences: 9.0 8.93414634146 101% => OK
Sentence length: 25.1111111111 23.0094962315 109% => OK
Sentence length SD: 35.6965952659 42.9750493124 83% => OK
Chars per sentence: 150.444444444 135.714022679 111% => OK
Words per sentence: 25.1111111111 23.0094962315 109% => OK
Discourse Markers: 0.666666666667 0.689975730869 97% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.84146341463 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.48048780488 0% => OK
Readability: 51.2173058014 47.7609492067 107% => OK
Elegance: 2.52272727273 2.94281807926 86% => OK
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0 0.418131533498 0% => The similarity between the topic and the content is low.
Sentence sentence coherence: 0.203672932701 0.181151798455 112% => OK
Sentence sentence coherence SD: 0.121646296476 0.0850326197045 143% => OK
Sentence paragraph coherence: 0.689062115894 0.706616315825 98% => OK
Sentence paragraph coherence SD: 0.177062213917 0.157042692854 113% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0 0.228904883108 0% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0 0.108899403657 0% => OK
Paragraph paragraph coherence: 0.337980045238 0.367819155151 92% => OK
Paragraph paragraph coherence SD: 0.0839460219192 0.0812612215331 103% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0 0.316326947829 0% => The content is off the topic.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0 0.0921553760075 0% => OK
Task Achievement:
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 3.70731707317 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.14146341463 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.08536585366 122% => OK
Positive topic words: 3.0 3.16585365854 95% => OK
Negative topic words: 1.0 0.956097560976 105% => OK
Neutral topic words: 4.0 3.02926829268 132% => OK
Total topic words: 8.0 7.1512195122 112% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.