The time people devote in job leaves very little time for personal life. How widespread is the problem? What problem will this shortage of time cause?
Recently, the phenomenon of creating difficulities in order to allocating so much time for working and do not ample sufficient to the personal living has sparked a heated debate among the populations. Although this idea has some catastrophic impacts as it is regarded by the substantial number of individuals both destruptive and minus, others hold opponents views. I am inclined to believe that it can be minus as it could lead to bigger problems.
From a social standpoint, there are several disadvantages of diminishing the personal time for being in families or friends due to being at work. From my own experience, when I was a university students, I performed an academic experiment which discovered these demerits. Firstly, this phenomenon has the huge influence on the childs' upbringing. Parental responsibilities will be omitted and the youths are influenced by their friends. Furthermore, every person needs sufficient time to relax and get away from the daily stress and difficult circumstances. If dwellers cannot refresh themselves, they will have an array of confrontations. Moreover, if this behaviour spreads out in the society, we will have a dull and aggressive nation with tired citizens. Hence, it might enhance the rate of crime and vandalism.
On the one hand, there is no doubt, the idea of allocating more time to work other than being at home has some adherents. They asserted that the ilfe has some financial issues and inhabitants are forced to meet their needs.
In conclusion, while there are several compelling arguments on both sides, I profoundly believe that the drawbacks of devoting more time for jobs and declining the personal time are far more outweight their benefits.
- The major purpose of television is to educate, not to entertain. Do you agree or disagree? 11
- For a successful company, selling products depends more on company's reputation or it depends more on if they provide discount and free offers. To what extent do you agree or disagree? 77
- Some people believe that in order to be effective, political leaders must yeild to public opinion and abandon principle for the sake of compromise. Others believe that the most essential quality of an effective leader is the ability to remain consistently 83
- Should library use digital gadgets to provide information on different topics? Pros & Cons 46
- People succeed because of their hard work; luck has nothing to do with success. Do you agree or disagree with this statement? Give reasons for your answer and include any relevant examples from your own knowledge or experience. 77
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, firstly, furthermore, hence, if, moreover, so, well, while, in conclusion, no doubt
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 10.5418719212 123% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 6.10837438424 115% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 8.36945812808 119% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 5.94088669951 84% => OK
Pronoun: 23.0 20.9802955665 110% => OK
Preposition: 32.0 31.9359605911 100% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 5.75862068966 69% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1443.0 1207.87684729 119% => OK
No of words: 276.0 242.827586207 114% => OK
Chars per words: 5.22826086957 5.00649968141 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.07593519647 3.92707691288 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.054042655 2.71678728327 112% => OK
Unique words: 175.0 139.433497537 126% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.634057971014 0.580463131201 109% => OK
syllable_count: 450.0 379.143842365 119% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.57093596059 102% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 4.6157635468 173% => OK
Article: 2.0 1.56157635468 128% => OK
Subordination: 5.0 1.71428571429 292% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.931034482759 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 3.65517241379 109% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 12.6551724138 111% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 20.5024630542 93% => OK
Sentence length SD: 45.3481430891 50.4703680194 90% => OK
Chars per sentence: 103.071428571 104.977214359 98% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.7142857143 20.9669160288 94% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.42857142857 7.25397266985 89% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.33497536946 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 6.9802955665 72% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 8.0 2.75862068966 290% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 2.91625615764 34% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.211474218056 0.242375264174 87% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.059667314409 0.0925447433944 64% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0629480405495 0.071462118173 88% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.127847143194 0.151781067708 84% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.061879957677 0.0609392437508 102% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.1 12.6369458128 104% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 52.19 53.1260098522 98% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.54236453202 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 10.9458128079 98% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.05 11.5310837438 113% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.1 8.32886699507 109% => OK
difficult_words: 79.0 55.0591133005 143% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.5 9.94827586207 146% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.3980295567 92% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.5123152709 95% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 77.7777777778 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 70.0 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.