The time people devote in job leaves very little time for personal life. How widespread is the problem? What problem will this shortage of time cause?
Recently the phenomenon of devoting time in jobs and its corresponding impact has sparked a heated debate. Although contested by many that the matters of the personal life are highly beneficial, such an issue is regarded thoroughly both constructive and positive by a substantial number of individuals. I am inclined to conceive that a widespread problem can be a plus, and I will investigate that throughout this essay.
From a social standpoint, devoted time for a job can provide the society with noticeable effects, which are rooted in the fact that merits, as well as advantages of an excellent personal life, are visible. According to my own experience, I performed an academic experiment that discovered the importance of efficient lifestyles. Thus, beneficial ramifications of solving widespread problems are remarkable.
From a scientific point of view, the shortage of time in the personal life can supply the community with negative impacts, which are related to the reality that demerits of inefficient jobs are crucial. As a tangible example, some scientific research undertaken by an elite university described frustrated people. Hence, predicted outcomes of vital problems are noticeable.
To conclude, while there are several compelling arguments on both sides, I profoundly believe that the benefits of devoting sufficient time in the personal life far outweigh its drawbacks. Not only do the advantages of solving widespread problems prove the significance of an efficient job, but also pinpoint possible implications.
- The lazy journalism has become commonplace in today's digitalized world. Explain what is it and the cause of it. How do you define "lazy" journalism and what is the cause? 88
- What do you think of bidding to host sports events? Is it a blessing or a curse? Give your opinions. 88
- Some people point that experiential learning (i.e. learning by doing it) can work well in formal education. However, others think a traditional form of teaching is the best. Do you think experiential learning can work well in high schools or colleges? 85
- Nowadays TV has become an essential part of life, and a bridge to spread news and awareness and for some it acts like a companion. What is your opinion about this? 80
- Which areas of concern should governments allocate funds to? Climate change, education, or public health? Explain your idea with examples. 88
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, hence, if, so, thus, well, while, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 10.5418719212 95% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 6.10837438424 65% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 8.36945812808 48% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 9.0 5.94088669951 151% => OK
Pronoun: 15.0 20.9802955665 71% => OK
Preposition: 30.0 31.9359605911 94% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 5.75862068966 69% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1307.0 1207.87684729 108% => OK
No of words: 236.0 242.827586207 97% => OK
Chars per words: 5.53813559322 5.00649968141 111% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.91947592106 3.92707691288 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.18431005219 2.71678728327 117% => OK
Unique words: 147.0 139.433497537 105% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.622881355932 0.580463131201 107% => OK
syllable_count: 424.8 379.143842365 112% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.57093596059 115% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 4.6157635468 65% => OK
Article: 1.0 1.56157635468 64% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 1.71428571429 233% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 2.0 0.931034482759 215% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 3.65517241379 109% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 12.6551724138 87% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 20.5024630542 102% => OK
Sentence length SD: 49.3730946907 50.4703680194 98% => OK
Chars per sentence: 118.818181818 104.977214359 113% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.4545454545 20.9669160288 102% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.0 7.25397266985 69% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.33497536946 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 6.9802955665 100% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 2.75862068966 145% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 2.91625615764 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.333105263505 0.242375264174 137% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.108222330436 0.0925447433944 117% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.064878165648 0.071462118173 91% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.196734248652 0.151781067708 130% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0220240610918 0.0609392437508 36% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.4 12.6369458128 122% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 33.24 53.1260098522 63% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 6.54236453202 171% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.8 10.9458128079 126% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.85 11.5310837438 129% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.63 8.32886699507 128% => OK
difficult_words: 89.0 55.0591133005 162% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.5 9.94827586207 146% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.3980295567 100% => OK
text_standard: 15.0 10.5123152709 143% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 80.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 72.0 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.