It is an irrefutable and undeniable fact that libraries have a myriad of books and a number of people are visiting the library for reading. As most of the information is available online through websites and digital books, some people think that library books are useless. This essay will discuss why library books are not useless and the benefits it provides.
With the advent of the internet, there is a humongous shift in the way people read books. There are myriad benefits associated with E-books and the information available online. For instance, people can easily carry a number of books on their handheld devices and they don't need to carry all the physical books everywhere. Also, there is a plethora of information available on the web and these days people rarely carry physical copies of books.
Nevertheless, they are some disadvantages associated with information available online. Readers need to carry their chargers for the handheld devices to read information online. Also, reading online induces stress to the reader's eyes and they get tired soon. For instance, a number of people started to have trouble with their eyesight due to augmented exposure to handheld devices. However, there are no drawbacks in reading the physical books which doesn't emit any light.
In conclusion, even though there are advantages with E-books and the information available online, the library books provide greater benefit in terms of health and energy consumption. In my opinion, I disagree that library books are useless even though a plethora of information is available online.
- Some say that music is as important as other subjects in schools, especially at the preschool level. Do you agree or disagree? Give your opinion. 55
- traditional learning vs experiential learning 55
- "More information available online so library'sbook are useless" or As e-books are available onlinethese days, the value of printed books has diminished.Agree or disagree. 77
- Some people believe laws change human behavior. Do you agree with it? 96
- Some people think that universities should not provide so much theoretical but give more practical training throughout their courses 77
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 270, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: don't
...ooks on their handheld devices and they dont need to carry all the physical books ev...
^^^^
Line 5, column 452, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: doesn't
...cks in reading the physical books which doesnt emit any light. In conclusion, even ...
^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, however, if, nevertheless, so, for instance, in conclusion, in my opinion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 10.5418719212 123% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 6.10837438424 65% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 8.36945812808 119% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 5.94088669951 67% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 15.0 20.9802955665 71% => OK
Preposition: 30.0 31.9359605911 94% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 5.75862068966 174% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1338.0 1207.87684729 111% => OK
No of words: 255.0 242.827586207 105% => OK
Chars per words: 5.24705882353 5.00649968141 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.99608801488 3.92707691288 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.68240454027 2.71678728327 99% => OK
Unique words: 120.0 139.433497537 86% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.470588235294 0.580463131201 81% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 427.5 379.143842365 113% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.57093596059 108% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 4.6157635468 87% => OK
Article: 2.0 1.56157635468 128% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.71428571429 117% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.931034482759 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 3.65517241379 82% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 12.6551724138 111% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 20.5024630542 88% => OK
Sentence length SD: 29.1117656276 50.4703680194 58% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 95.5714285714 104.977214359 91% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.2142857143 20.9669160288 87% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.64285714286 7.25397266985 78% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.33497536946 37% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 6.9802955665 72% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 2.75862068966 217% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 2.91625615764 103% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.243636904739 0.242375264174 101% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.105067548684 0.0925447433944 114% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0790961048987 0.071462118173 111% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.177980154071 0.151781067708 117% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0704461261296 0.0609392437508 116% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.4 12.6369458128 98% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 44.75 53.1260098522 84% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.54236453202 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 10.9458128079 105% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.17 11.5310837438 114% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.06 8.32886699507 97% => OK
difficult_words: 57.0 55.0591133005 104% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 9.94827586207 85% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.3980295567 88% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.5123152709 86% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 55.5555555556 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 50.0 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.