Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? Modern technology is creating a single world culture. Use specific reasons and examples to support your opinion.
People live in different kind of cultures. Some people really like their cultural features but others hate thier cultural specialties. In my opinion, culture has great impact on peoples' behaviours. They influnce to even their daily life. However, alhought people is effected by culture, they create a single massive culture for all over the world. In other words, I agree with statement and I am going to explain it with several example.
Firstly, people had to very diversity cultures, such as Turkish and American culture. If I am compare with these two cultures, I could not find very different cultural features. However, If I had chanced to evaluate Turkish and American cultures, I would find their variety easly. In the other definition, American culture had not really influenced for other cultural until the 1990's. Beacuse even American culture was isolated by international politics. For example, World War 1 and World War 2 had bad impact on cultural relations. But nowadays, these kind of circumstances are not exist. In this reason, cultures has chance to share their specialities. For example, people has been living globalization for more than one decade. In this condition gives that people make some export and import. This really beneficial to share cultures between states and people. For instance, Apple company has abilities to impact all cultures in the world and these cultures are destoring graduately by this kind of popular company. In the result, some of cultures which is has not protect by powerful states are got damage by globalization.
Secondly, cultures are influnced by popular cultural. Popularity can delete easly other weak cultures in the world. What is mean weak cultures and popularities. Weak cultures means that a country which is not great economical and military power. Besides that country has not enough power to save their cultural beacuse it is concored by other strong culturals. For instance, a rock group such as Metallica. This rock group had conser in Moscow just had been collapase after the Cold War. After this process Soviet Union or Russia had never been stay same in terms of culture beacuse Russians had never been listening to rock until the at that moment. In sum popular cultures always died other cultures with thier strong states.
In the conclusion, I agree with this statement because of these reasons. Cultures is dead one by one in the world. I hope to culture is manage to survive for all people beacuse cultures has great value for people.
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? Modern technology is creating a single world culture. Use specific reasons and examples to support your opinion. 66
- If you could change one important thing about your hometown, what would you change? Use reasons and specific examples to support your answer. 3
- It is better for children to choose jobs that are similar to their parents’ jobs than to choose jobs that are very different from their parents’ job. 3
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? Teachers should be paidaccording to how much their students learn. Give specific reasons and examples to supportyour opinion. 60
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?Technology has made children less creative than they were in the past. 70
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 423, Rule ID: MANY_NN[1]
Message: Possible agreement error. The noun example seems to be countable; consider using: 'several examples'.
Suggestion: several examples
...ement and I am going to explain it with several example. Firstly, people had to very divers...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 96, Rule ID: BEEN_PART_AGREEMENT[1]
Message: Consider using a past participle here: 'compared'.
Suggestion: compared
...s Turkish and American culture. If I am compare with these two cultures, I could not fi...
^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 550, Rule ID: THIS_NNS[2]
Message: Did you mean 'this kind' or 'these kinds'?
Suggestion: this kind; these kinds
...ct on cultural relations. But nowadays, these kind of circumstances are not exist. In this...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 586, Rule ID: BEEN_PART_AGREEMENT[2]
Message: Consider using a past participle here: 'existed'.
Suggestion: existed
...ys, these kind of circumstances are not exist. In this reason, cultures has chance to...
^^^^^
Line 3, column 1037, Rule ID: MOST_SOME_OF_NNS[1]
Message: After 'some of', you should use 'the' ('some of the cultures') or simply say ''some cultures''.
Suggestion: some of the cultures; some cultures
...kind of popular company. In the result, some of cultures which is has not protect by powerful st...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 1071, Rule ID: HAVE_PART_AGREEMENT[2]
Message: Possible agreement error -- use past participle here: 'protected'.
Suggestion: protected
...sult, some of cultures which is has not protect by powerful states are got damage by gl...
^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 255, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...t economical and military power. Besides that country has not enough power to sav...
^^
Line 7, column 138, Rule ID: BEEN_PART_AGREEMENT[1]
Message: Consider using a past participle here: 'managed'.
Suggestion: managed
... one in the world. I hope to culture is manage to survive for all people beacuse cultu...
^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
besides, but, first, firstly, however, if, really, second, secondly, so, for example, for instance, kind of, such as, in my opinion, in other words
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 16.0 15.1003584229 106% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 3.0 9.8082437276 31% => OK
Conjunction : 12.0 13.8261648746 87% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 11.0286738351 54% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 33.0 43.0788530466 77% => OK
Preposition: 55.0 52.1666666667 105% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 8.0752688172 99% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2107.0 1977.66487455 107% => OK
No of words: 414.0 407.700716846 102% => OK
Chars per words: 5.08937198068 4.8611393121 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.51076378781 4.48103885553 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.58922439013 2.67179642975 97% => OK
Unique words: 200.0 212.727598566 94% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.48309178744 0.524837075471 92% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 675.9 618.680645161 109% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.51630824373 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 10.0 9.59856630824 104% => OK
Article: 1.0 3.08781362007 32% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 3.51792114695 85% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.86738351254 54% => OK
Preposition: 10.0 4.94265232975 202% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 31.0 20.6003584229 150% => OK
Sentence length: 13.0 20.1344086022 65% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 29.413058183 48.9658058833 60% => OK
Chars per sentence: 67.9677419355 100.406767564 68% => OK
Words per sentence: 13.3548387097 20.6045352989 65% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.74193548387 5.45110844103 87% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 8.0 5.5376344086 144% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 12.0 11.8709677419 101% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 8.0 3.85842293907 207% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 11.0 4.88709677419 225% => Less facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0719360979375 0.236089414692 30% => The similarity between the topic and the content is low.
Sentence topic coherence: 0.025628768325 0.076458572812 34% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0424457586711 0.0737576698707 58% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0659082706615 0.150856017488 44% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0418679689663 0.0645574589148 65% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 9.2 11.7677419355 78% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 58.28 58.1214874552 100% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.10430107527 51% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.4 10.1575268817 83% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.65 10.9000537634 107% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.83 8.01818996416 98% => OK
difficult_words: 93.0 86.8835125448 107% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 5.5 10.002688172 55% => Linsear_write_formula is low.
gunning_fog: 7.2 10.0537634409 72% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 10.247311828 78% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 66.6666666667 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 20.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.