The tables show the percentage of young people who were employed in different sectors in one country in 2005 and 2010.
The tabular chart illustrates the information about that the proportion of youngster people choose the seven different position in one particular nations from 2005 to 2010.
A quick look on graph is enough to make it clear that younger people like to work in various field. But, they opt for more social services in only initially year and restaurants and hotels in just last year.
According to charts, in 2005 and 2010 in one country younger people in three field agriculture, bussiness and transport less than like accounted 17 and 22 combine. In next, the position of manufacturing in 2005 more fascinated which was, at 21 percent but, after half decade the figure for manufacture was steadily decrease nearby 14 %, respectively.
As far as, in sector of social services starting from the year the largest as compared to other field approximately 34 % and this followed by in 2010 the figure for the reached to under quater. On the other hand, the restaurant and hotels of position, the figure for highlight the upward trend in terms of slightly increase which was account for more than one in third.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2022-06-11 | Jocelyn | 78 | view |
| 2018-11-01 | Har preet singh | 85 | view |
- Some people think that government should pay for health care and education, but others individual claims it is the people responsibility. Discuss both point of view and give your opinions. 73
- Describe the information presented below, comparing results for men and women in the categories shown. 78
- The graph below the unemployment rates in females in each country of The U.K in 2013 and 2014. 73
- Some people say that e books and modern technology will totally replace traditional newspaper and magazines to what extend do you agree or disagree. 78
- The bar chart shows to the percentage of male and female teacher choosing the teaching in six different types of educational sector in the U.K in 2010. 78
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 156, Rule ID: CD_NN[1]
Message: Possible agreement error. The noun 'combine' seems to be countable, so consider using: 'combines'.
Suggestion: combines
...port less than like accounted 17 and 22 combine. In next, the position of manufacturing...
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, if, look, so, third, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 4.0 7.0 57% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 6.8 118% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 3.15609756098 127% => OK
Pronoun: 5.0 5.60731707317 89% => OK
Preposition: 35.0 33.7804878049 104% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 3.97073170732 126% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 919.0 965.302439024 95% => OK
No of words: 187.0 196.424390244 95% => OK
Chars per words: 4.91443850267 4.92477711251 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.69794460899 3.73543355544 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.66128624925 2.65546596893 100% => OK
Unique words: 117.0 106.607317073 110% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.625668449198 0.547539520022 114% => OK
syllable_count: 270.9 283.868780488 95% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 5.0 4.33902439024 115% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.07073170732 187% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 3.36585365854 208% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 7.0 8.94146341463 78% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 26.0 22.4926829268 116% => OK
Sentence length SD: 35.0177797406 43.030603864 81% => OK
Chars per sentence: 131.285714286 112.824112599 116% => OK
Words per sentence: 26.7142857143 22.9334400587 116% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.14285714286 5.23603664747 117% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 3.70975609756 135% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.09268292683 49% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.159585861755 0.215688989381 74% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0749016133276 0.103423049105 72% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0708399959895 0.0843802449381 84% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.10163959481 0.15604864568 65% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0633821784606 0.0819641961636 77% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.1 13.2329268293 114% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 62.01 61.2550243902 101% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 10.3012195122 108% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.49 11.4140731707 101% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.39 8.06136585366 104% => OK
difficult_words: 41.0 40.7170731707 101% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 11.4329268293 101% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.4 10.9970731707 113% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.0658536585 108% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.