Should universities admit equal number of male and female students in every subject?
Education is not only one of the most part of every individual’s life but also is one of the most inevitable parts. In this field both male and female are able and considered. But nowadays it is very controversial that if educational systems should accept the same number of men and women in each field of studding or not. From my own stand of view, it is completely refused that university should own the same number of these two sexes due to distinctive or physical differences.
First of all, one of the most remarkable reasons that does not let men and women educate equally at university is natural and distinctive unlikeness. Accordingly, some adjective is introduced exclusively in female or male so some jobs cannot be done by both of them justly. For example, adult male is not able to educate in field of nurturing infants because of the fact that he does not have adequate patience to look after a person who is immature and powerless. Although there are few exceptions everywhere.
To continue with some a few physical dissimilarities which reduce the chance of succeed for both mature boys and girls in the term of advanced education is physical dissimilarities. Our creator has given men irrefutable amount of strength and stamina that women are not afforded. Take engineer majors for example. In this way the factor that intercept girls to go on the feet of boys is power and stamina. Moreover, this tip can assist males to carry out some distinct majors better than females more effortlessly.
All in all, the fact that universities and educational institutions do not take in the identical number of both girls and boys students is utterly logical. What makes this issue extremely convincing is not only physical but also intuitive contrasts. I believe that it is so objective that it is not required to discuss. Although there are myriad fields that cannot contain same number of different sex students but universities have to let a few anomalies in.
Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
---|---|---|---|
2019-08-27 | kingdangyeu0606 | 84 | view |
2019-04-23 | sandhu12 | 61 | view |
2019-03-12 | annatran12324 | 84 | view |
2018-11-07 | golarghavan | 67 | view |
2018-11-07 | golarghavan | 56 | view |
- the pie charts below show units of electricity production by fuel source in Australia and France in 1980 and 2000.summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparison where relevant. 78
- IN THE LAST FEW DECADES THE NUMBER OF STAY-AT-HOME DADS HAS BEEN INCREASING NOTICEABLY.WHY IS IT HAPPENING?IS IT A MORE POSITIVE OR NEGATIVE PHENOMENON? 73
- The two maps below show road access to a city hospital in 2007 and 2010.summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant. 61
- The two maps below show road access to a city hospital in 2007 and 2010.summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant. 56
- The two maps below show road access to a city hospital in 2007 and 2010.summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant. 56
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 352, Rule ID: BECAUSE_OF_THE_FACT_THAT[1]
Message: This phrase is redundant. Use simply 'because'.
Suggestion: because
...o educate in field of nurturing infants because of the fact that he does not have adequate patience to l...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 466, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “Although” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
...a person who is immature and powerless. Although there are few exceptions everywhere. ...
^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
accordingly, also, but, first, if, look, moreover, so, for example, first of all
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 19.0 13.1623246493 144% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 7.85571142285 64% => OK
Conjunction : 18.0 10.4138276553 173% => OK
Relative clauses : 12.0 7.30460921844 164% => OK
Pronoun: 24.0 24.0651302605 100% => OK
Preposition: 42.0 41.998997996 100% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 8.3376753507 36% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1650.0 1615.20841683 102% => OK
No of words: 336.0 315.596192385 106% => OK
Chars per words: 4.91071428571 5.12529762239 96% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.28139028586 4.20363070211 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.89408165344 2.80592935109 103% => OK
Unique words: 181.0 176.041082164 103% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.53869047619 0.561755894193 96% => OK
syllable_count: 549.0 506.74238477 108% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 16.0721442886 106% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 20.2975951904 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 45.0071889682 49.4020404114 91% => OK
Chars per sentence: 97.0588235294 106.682146367 91% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.7647058824 20.7667163134 95% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.70588235294 7.06120827912 67% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.67935871743 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 3.4128256513 176% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.209924001497 0.244688304435 86% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0551619390317 0.084324248473 65% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0533465404995 0.0667982634062 80% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.121772667138 0.151304729494 80% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0552052003504 0.056905535591 97% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.6 13.0946893788 89% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 52.19 50.2224549098 104% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 11.3001002004 95% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.2 12.4159519038 90% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.29 8.58950901804 97% => OK
difficult_words: 79.0 78.4519038076 101% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 9.78957915832 123% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.1190380762 95% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.