Task 2:
The consumption of the world’s resources such as oil or water is increasing at a dangerous rate. What are the causes and solutions
It is true that the usage of global resources is going at a warming level. There are some reasons to explain this trend and many solutions should be conducted to solve the problems.
To begin with, there are some reasons why the expenditure on the world’s resources is achieving a dangerous rate. The first reason is that people tend to use the means of private transport instead of using made of public transport and riding a bicycle. This is because it is comfortable and relax for individuals to move to workplaces and somewhere when you drive cars and motorcycles leading to the overspending on fuels. In addition, the second reason is that most businesses get the lack of cooperation in the exploitation of the fuels and energy in terms of solar and water which could be useful to replace the coal, oil and gas like renewable power. For example, if you use solar power, you will reserve the environment and also have nearly eternal resources.
Furthermore, there are some solutions which both government and residents play an important role in modern life. Firstly, the authorities ought to enact laws and run campaigns. These will help local people promote public awareness in the usage of renewable energy rather than coal, gas and oil. Moreover, finance penalty would be a great example for this solution. Additionally, residents have to take responsibilities for joining hands to save fuels and use renewable power as well as using solar panels and hydroelectric.
In conclusion, there are many reasons to account for this tendency-at an alarming rate and some things should be carried out to resolve the issues.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2018-11-07 | hoangquang | 73 | view |
- The percentage of tourists to England who visited Brighton attractions 61
- In recent years, many small local shops have closed because customers travel to large shopping centres or malls to do their shopping? Is this a positive or negative development? 61
- task 1: France, Germany 11
- the proportion of women members of parliament in European nations from 2000 to 2012. 90
- task 1: the consumption of four different food groups per person per week 73
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, first, firstly, furthermore, if, moreover, second, so, well, for example, in addition, in conclusion, as well as, it is true, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 15.0 13.1623246493 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 7.85571142285 89% => OK
Conjunction : 15.0 10.4138276553 144% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 7.30460921844 82% => OK
Pronoun: 13.0 24.0651302605 54% => OK
Preposition: 34.0 41.998997996 81% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 8.3376753507 84% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1358.0 1615.20841683 84% => OK
No of words: 272.0 315.596192385 86% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.99264705882 5.12529762239 97% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.06108636974 4.20363070211 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.80215562105 2.80592935109 100% => OK
Unique words: 157.0 176.041082164 89% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.577205882353 0.561755894193 103% => OK
syllable_count: 433.8 506.74238477 86% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 16.0721442886 81% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 20.0 20.2975951904 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 44.1839886392 49.4020404114 89% => OK
Chars per sentence: 104.461538462 106.682146367 98% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.9230769231 20.7667163134 101% => OK
Discourse Markers: 11.1538461538 7.06120827912 158% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.67935871743 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.112221638841 0.244688304435 46% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0417974374225 0.084324248473 50% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0602329333863 0.0667982634062 90% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0698794496295 0.151304729494 46% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0259529520009 0.056905535591 46% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.5 13.0946893788 95% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 51.18 50.2224549098 102% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 11.3001002004 98% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.66 12.4159519038 94% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.4 8.58950901804 98% => OK
difficult_words: 65.0 78.4519038076 83% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 9.78957915832 112% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.1190380762 99% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.