It is certainly a fact that a normal classroom was composed of various students with distinctive personalities, be it well-mannered, lively, and uncontrolled or so. While some people propose to classify the students with annoying behavior into groups in order to maintain the great quality of learning. From my perspective, I totally disagree with the suggestion due to several reasons, which would be elaborated in the following paragraphs.
First and foremost, it is fundamental to treat every school pupils equally. Every student possess a right of equity to have ordinary environment of learning. From my experience as a student, it is frequent to have classmates who often bother the teacher and the other peers during the class. However, the teachers deal with the problem by cultivating a good relationship with them rather than categorizing them. Successful education for students may be accomplished by various means, but being impartial to every student must be taken as priority.
In addition to the reason above, sorting the misbehaved students into groups may have a detrimental influence on the pupils. To demonstrate, plenty of cases could be apparently seen on the internet and newspaper. Students who unwilling to comply with the class rules were assembled into categories. Such action not only seriously devastates their confidence, but further jeopardizes their health.
Last but not least, the assimilation between students plays an essential role in the classroom. The students tend to be affected by other classmates with outstanding performance and characteristics. Further to this point, from some empirical evidences at school, students with satisfying grades and courteous behavior have positive implications on those problematic students. The troublesome students eventually attain better final scores in terms of exam and attitude.
As argued above, resulting from the benefits it bring, I am convinced that students with disappointing grades and behavior deserve the identical learning condition as other peers.
- The diagrams below give information on transport and car use in Edmonton. Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant. 73
- The chart below shows how frequently people in the USA ate in fast food restaurants between 2003 and 2013.Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relavant. 56
- Many people believe that educational standards have declined in recent times, particularly in the areas of literacy and numeracy. Discuss the causes of this problem and offer some possible solutions to it. 78
- The graph shows estimated oil production capacity for several Gulf countries between 1990 and 2010.Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant. 67
- The graph shows the proportion of the population aged 65 and over between 1940 and 2040 in three different countries. 84
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 166, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “While” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
...nnered, lively, and uncontrolled or so. While some people propose to classify the stu...
^^^^^
Line 3, column 91, Rule ID: MASS_AGREEMENT[2]
Message: Possible agreement error - use third-person verb forms for singular and mass nouns: 'possesses'.
Suggestion: possesses
...ry school pupils equally. Every student possess a right of equity to have ordinary envi...
^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 200, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Further,
...anding performance and characteristics. Further to this point, from some empirical evid...
^^^^^^^
Line 9, column 49, Rule ID: IT_VBZ[1]
Message: Did you mean 'brings'?
Suggestion: brings
...d above, resulting from the benefits it bring, I am convinced that students with disa...
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
apparently, but, first, however, if, may, so, well, while, in addition
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 13.1623246493 91% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 7.85571142285 64% => OK
Conjunction : 12.0 10.4138276553 115% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 7.30460921844 68% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 17.0 24.0651302605 71% => OK
Preposition: 49.0 41.998997996 117% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 8.3376753507 120% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1743.0 1615.20841683 108% => OK
No of words: 310.0 315.596192385 98% => OK
Chars per words: 5.62258064516 5.12529762239 110% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.19604776685 4.20363070211 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.10771086258 2.80592935109 111% => OK
Unique words: 192.0 176.041082164 109% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.61935483871 0.561755894193 110% => OK
syllable_count: 529.2 506.74238477 104% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 4.0 2.52805611222 158% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 3.0 0.809619238477 371% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 16.0721442886 106% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 20.2975951904 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 32.1946931946 49.4020404114 65% => OK
Chars per sentence: 102.529411765 106.682146367 96% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.2352941176 20.7667163134 88% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.11764705882 7.06120827912 58% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.38176352705 114% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 5.01903807615 80% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 8.67935871743 104% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 3.9879759519 125% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.240228278901 0.244688304435 98% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0782532425085 0.084324248473 93% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0521948912294 0.0667982634062 78% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.130520243897 0.151304729494 86% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0486944747225 0.056905535591 86% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.2 13.0946893788 108% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 44.75 50.2224549098 89% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 11.3001002004 102% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.32 12.4159519038 123% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.83 8.58950901804 114% => OK
difficult_words: 104.0 78.4519038076 133% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 9.78957915832 87% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.1190380762 91% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.