The given bar chart compares the number of production and consumption in terms of electricity in the category of ten countries in 2014. On the whole, China and United States were the leading countries according to the production and utilization of electricity.
Turning to the detail, in terms of the pinnacle, China produced 5398 billion kWh of electricity and consumed 5322 billion kWh of electricity in 2014, which was the highest among the whole. In contrast, the lowest figure could be observed in Korea, with 485.1 billion kWh and 449.5 kWh of electricity, respectively.
The most striking point is the similarity as can be seen in the chart. The number of Russia in terms of electricity production is nearly on par with that of consumption, with 1057 billion kWh and 1038 billion kWh in production and consumption of electricity. Moreover, the yawning gap fell into the category of United States, with 233 billion kWh gap of electricity.
- Television cannot replace the book as a learning tool, which is why children are less well educated today. To what extent do you agree or disagree with this statement? 78
- Some people say History is one of the most important subjects. Other people say that, in today's world, subject like science and technology are more important than History.discuss both view and give your opinion. 67
- The bar chart below shows the estimated percentage of car trips taken by drivers in 2005. 73
- Modern technology has made it easier for individuals to download copyrighted music and books from Internet for no charge.To what extend is this a positive or a negative development? 73
- Children who grow up in families which are short of money are better prepared with the problems of adult life than children who are brought up by wealthy parents. To what extent do you agree or disagree? 56
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 188, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...h that of consumption, with 1057 billion kWh and 1038 billion kWh in production a...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
moreover, in contrast, on the whole
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 6.0 7.0 86% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 2.0 1.00243902439 200% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 6.8 103% => OK
Relative clauses : 2.0 3.15609756098 63% => OK
Pronoun: 1.0 5.60731707317 18% => OK
Preposition: 34.0 33.7804878049 101% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 3.97073170732 201% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 794.0 965.302439024 82% => OK
No of words: 157.0 196.424390244 80% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.05732484076 4.92477711251 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.53976893118 3.73543355544 95% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.9572254497 2.65546596893 111% => OK
Unique words: 78.0 106.607317073 73% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.496815286624 0.547539520022 91% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 230.4 283.868780488 81% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Article: 5.0 4.33902439024 115% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 3.36585365854 178% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 7.0 8.94146341463 78% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 22.0 22.4926829268 98% => OK
Sentence length SD: 39.3498178301 43.030603864 91% => OK
Chars per sentence: 113.428571429 112.824112599 101% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.4285714286 22.9334400587 98% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.0 5.23603664747 95% => OK
Paragraphs: 3.0 3.83414634146 78% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 3.70975609756 108% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.09268292683 49% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.126727513006 0.215688989381 59% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.074417013845 0.103423049105 72% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0889521890992 0.0843802449381 105% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.111606611634 0.15604864568 72% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0840130844985 0.0819641961636 102% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.6 13.2329268293 103% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 57.61 61.2550243902 94% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 10.3012195122 104% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.36 11.4140731707 108% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.95 8.06136585366 99% => OK
difficult_words: 32.0 40.7170731707 79% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 11.4329268293 105% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.9970731707 98% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.0658536585 99% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.