A rise in the standard of living in a country often only seems to benefit cities rather than rural areas. What problems might this difference cause? How might these problems be reduced?
Nowadays, cities are receiving more benefits than rural regions from the increase in living conditions in a nation. At the same time, however, there is some uncertainty as to the problems this situation entails, and how it might be resolved. In this essay I will examine the issue and seek some possible solutions.
To begin with, in regard to problems, there is no doubt that city authorities may face larger difficulties in managing the whole city. Since better conditions there may be more likely to attract more residents from the countryside, the city government may have a greater deal of trouble in keeping order for there may be larger population. In addition, the unbalance in living conditions between the city and the countryside may give rise to labor shortage in the rural areas, with fewer people engaging in agricultural activities when farmers are pouring into the city.
On the other hand, as to solutions, the government should improve the living standards in the countryside, since better living standards may prevent some of the farmers from moving out. A good case in point is that advanced medical services or college education may encourage the local people to stay when they are sick or plan to go to college. Also, the government should create more job opportunities for the native people in the poor areas, for this can allow them to earn the same amount of money as they do in the city.
To summarize, there is no doubt that the disparity in living standards between towns and remote places may result in crowded cities and labor shortage in a country. At the same time, however, two solutions can be effective against these issues. In the final analysis, therefore, one can only conclude that a country can be considered developed only when everyone there can equally enjoy economic benefits.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2021-03-19 | Azizbekkkkkaaaa | 61 | view |
| 2018-11-10 | Frank Chen | 84 | view |
- Responsible tourist means that people should preserve both environment and culture when visiting another place Some people say that is impossible to be responsible tourist To what extent do you agree or disagree 79
- The chart below shows how frequently people in the USA ate in fast food restaurants between 2003 and 2013. 56
- Some people say that the best way to improve public health is by increasing the number of sports facilities. Others, however, say that this would have little effect on public health and that other measures are required. Discuss both these views and give y 89
- Now children spend a lot of time playing computer games and little time doing sports. Why is this? Do you think it is a positive or negative development? 61
- The table below gives information on consumer spending on different items in five different countries in 2002. 56
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 150, Rule ID: SOME_OF_THE[1]
Message: Simply use 'some'.
Suggestion: some
...nce better living standards may prevent some of the farmers from moving out. A good case in...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, however, if, may, so, therefore, as to, in addition, no doubt, in regard to, to begin with, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 13.1623246493 91% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 17.0 7.85571142285 216% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 7.0 10.4138276553 67% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 7.30460921844 96% => OK
Pronoun: 13.0 24.0651302605 54% => OK
Preposition: 46.0 41.998997996 110% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 8.3376753507 96% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1529.0 1615.20841683 95% => OK
No of words: 307.0 315.596192385 97% => OK
Chars per words: 4.98045602606 5.12529762239 97% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.18585898806 4.20363070211 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.63163155106 2.80592935109 94% => OK
Unique words: 164.0 176.041082164 93% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.534201954397 0.561755894193 95% => OK
syllable_count: 495.9 506.74238477 98% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 5.43587174349 0% => OK
Article: 5.0 2.52805611222 198% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 12.0 4.76152304609 252% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 16.0721442886 75% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 25.0 20.2975951904 123% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 45.6316775935 49.4020404114 92% => OK
Chars per sentence: 127.416666667 106.682146367 119% => OK
Words per sentence: 25.5833333333 20.7667163134 123% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.58333333333 7.06120827912 136% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 8.67935871743 104% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 3.4128256513 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.216629469232 0.244688304435 89% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0757378611324 0.084324248473 90% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0567105329911 0.0667982634062 85% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.131058263235 0.151304729494 87% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0693594620878 0.056905535591 122% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.8 13.0946893788 113% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 46.1 50.2224549098 92% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.0 11.3001002004 115% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.9 12.4159519038 96% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.68 8.58950901804 101% => OK
difficult_words: 74.0 78.4519038076 94% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 9.78957915832 107% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.0 10.1190380762 119% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.