fossil fuels (e.g. coal, oil, natural gas) are the main sources of energy in many countries, but in some countries the use of alternative sources of energy is encouraged. Is it a positive or negative development?

Essay topics:

fossil fuels (e.g. coal, oil, natural gas) are the main sources of energy in many countries, but in some countries the use of alternative sources of energy is encouraged. Is it a positive or negative development?

Nowadays, many hold the view that using alternative energies has a positive impact on society, while there is a body of opinion which holds that developing alternative energies is negative. In this essay I will examine both sides of the debate to seek a conclusion.
To begin with, it is undeniable that using alternative energies can help decline the environmental pollution, since such energies as solar or wind power are clean and produce no emissions when they are used to operate machines, like cars. Apart from that, alternative energies can avoid energy crisis for they are renewable. For example, solar energy replaces petrol to run cars without being depleted due to the fact that it is infinite and also this traditional fuel will be preserved.
On the other hand, however, using alternative energies is expensive. The reason is that the machines powered by these energies are specially made, which means that the raw material for these devices is rare and costs factories a fortune to collect. Furthermore, the new energy may be low efficient. To be specific, as modern technology is not advanced enough to exploit the pristine solar power completely and efficiently apply it in industrial activities.
To summarize, there is no doubt that employing alternative energies is a good way to protect the environment and provide human beings with endless resources. At the same time, however, alternative energy has a low efficiency and high costs. In the final analysis, therefore, one can only conclude that alternative energies have more positive effects.

Votes
Average: 6.1 (1 vote)
This essay topic by users
Post date Users Rates Link to Content
2019-01-12 Frank Chen 56 view
2019-01-12 Frank Chen 56 view
2019-01-12 Frank Chen 56 view
2018-12-13 Frank Chen 78 view
2018-12-13 Frank Chen 61 view
Essays by user Frank Chen :

Comments

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 11, Rule ID: MANY_NN[1]
Message: Possible agreement error. The noun hold seems to be countable; consider using: 'many holds'.
Suggestion: many holds
Nowadays, many hold the view that using alternative energie...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 2, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...s of the debate to seek a conclusion. To begin with, it is undeniable that usi...
^^
Line 2, column 205, Rule ID: ADMIT_ENJOY_VB[5]
Message: This verb is used with the gerund form: 'used to operating'.
Suggestion: used to operating
... and produce no emissions when they are used to operate machines, like cars. Apart from that, a...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...s traditional fuel will be preserved. On the other hand, however, using altern...
^^
Line 4, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ly apply it in industrial activities. To summarize, there is no doubt that emp...
^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, furthermore, however, if, may, so, therefore, while, apart from, for example, no doubt, to begin with, on the other hand

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 18.0 13.1623246493 137% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 7.85571142285 76% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 10.4138276553 67% => OK
Relative clauses : 12.0 7.30460921844 164% => OK
Pronoun: 19.0 24.0651302605 79% => OK
Preposition: 25.0 41.998997996 60% => More preposition wanted.
Nominalization: 2.0 8.3376753507 24% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1317.0 1615.20841683 82% => OK
No of words: 253.0 315.596192385 80% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.20553359684 5.12529762239 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.98822939669 4.20363070211 95% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.83425393358 2.80592935109 101% => OK
Unique words: 156.0 176.041082164 89% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.616600790514 0.561755894193 110% => OK
syllable_count: 443.7 506.74238477 88% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.60771543086 112% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 5.43587174349 18% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 10.0 4.76152304609 210% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 16.0721442886 75% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 21.0 20.2975951904 103% => OK
Sentence length SD: 56.4355581369 49.4020404114 114% => OK
Chars per sentence: 109.75 106.682146367 103% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.0833333333 20.7667163134 102% => OK
Discourse Markers: 10.5 7.06120827912 149% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 5.0 5.01903807615 100% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 8.67935871743 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.9879759519 25% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.262953222178 0.244688304435 107% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.104490175167 0.084324248473 124% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0715275298756 0.0667982634062 107% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.169918091708 0.151304729494 112% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0343634438562 0.056905535591 60% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.6 13.0946893788 104% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 33.24 50.2224549098 66% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.8 11.3001002004 122% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.94 12.4159519038 104% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.11 8.58950901804 106% => OK
difficult_words: 71.0 78.4519038076 91% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 9.78957915832 117% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.1190380762 103% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 10.7795591182 130% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------
More content wanted.

Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.